Code Quality Had 5 Pillars. AI Broke 3 and Created 2 We Can’t Measure
We formalized that gut sense into five things: readability, maintainability, security hygiene, documentation, and structural simplicity.
We formalized that gut sense into five things: readability, maintainability, security hygiene, documentation, and structural simplicity.
We formalized that gut sense into five things: readability, maintainability, security hygiene, documentation, and structural simplicity.
If you've been writing production software for more than a few years, you grew up with a gut sense of what "good code" meant beyond "it works." You could look at a pull request and feel whether the code was...
We built tools to measure them, argued about them in code reviews, and underneath all of it sat an assumption so obvious that nobody bothered to say it out loud — a human wrote this, and that human can...
The page is ready to read now. The fuller skim-friendly version will appear here automatically.
We formalized that gut sense into five things: readability, maintainability, security hygiene, documentation, and structural simplicity. If you've been writing production software for more than a few years, you grew up with a gut sense of what "good code" meant beyond "it works." You could look at a pull request and feel whether the code was clean, or if the logic was going to be a nightmare to debug in six months. We built tools to measure them, argued about them in code reviews, and underneath all of it sat an assumption so obvious that nobody bothered to say it out loud — a human wrote this, and that human can explain why every line is there.
We built tools to measure them, argued about them in code reviews, and underneath all of it sat an assumption so obvious that nobody bothered to say it out loud — a human wrote this, and that human can explain why every line is there.
Open the app view to save this story, compare related coverage, and continue from the same source.