Dzone iconDzoneMay 12, 2026

Code Quality Had 5 Pillars. AI Broke 3 and Created 2 We Can’t Measure

We formalized that gut sense into five things: readability, maintainability, security hygiene, documentation, and structural simplicity.

Code Quality Had 5 Pillars. AI Broke 3 and Created 2 We Can’t Measure

Share this story

Send the public story page.

Useful takeaways from this story.

We formalized that gut sense into five things: readability, maintainability, security hygiene, documentation, and structural simplicity.

If you've been writing production software for more than a few years, you grew up with a gut sense of what "good code" meant beyond "it works." You could look at a pull request and feel whether the code was...

We built tools to measure them, argued about them in code reviews, and underneath all of it sat an assumption so obvious that nobody bothered to say it out loud — a human wrote this, and that human can...

Building the complete brief

The page is ready to read now. The fuller skim-friendly version will appear here automatically.

The useful part

We formalized that gut sense into five things: readability, maintainability, security hygiene, documentation, and structural simplicity. If you've been writing production software for more than a few years, you grew up with a gut sense of what "good code" meant beyond "it works." You could look at a pull request and feel whether the code was clean, or if the logic was going to be a nightmare to debug in six months. We built tools to measure them, argued about them in code reviews, and underneath all of it sat an assumption so obvious that nobody bothered to say it out loud — a human wrote this, and that human can explain why every line is there.

How it works

  • If you've been writing production software for more than a few years, you grew up with a gut sense of what "good code" meant beyond "it works." You could look at a pull request and feel whether the code was...

Details worth keeping

We built tools to measure them, argued about them in code reviews, and underneath all of it sat an assumption so obvious that nobody bothered to say it out loud — a human wrote this, and that human can explain why every line is there.

Keep reading in the app

Open the app view to save this story, compare related coverage, and continue from the same source.

Open in app