Theguardian iconTheguardianAug 31, 2026 ~1 min source read

The law won't save us from Meta's 'pervert glasses'. The only solution is mockery | Jonathan Liew

Let's shame them off the streets So far I am yet to be tempted into purchasing a pair of Ray-Ban Meta glasses. Nor am I one of those consumers who professes to be "really into gadgets", a preference I've always found weirdly unspecific.

The law won't save us from Meta's 'pervert glasses'. The only solution is mockery | Jonathan Liew

Share this story

Send the public story page.

Useful takeaways from this story.

Let's shame them off the streets So far I am yet to be tempted into purchasing a pair of Ray-Ban Meta glasses.

What they really mean is something gimmicky and expensive that almost certainly requires the services of a datacentre and enough water to irrigate Kent.

Nor am I one of those consumers who professes to be "really into gadgets", a preference I've always found weirdly unspecific.

Building the complete brief

The page is ready to read now. The fuller skim-friendly version will appear here automatically.

The useful part

Let's shame them off the streets So far I am yet to be tempted into purchasing a pair of Ray-Ban Meta glasses. Nor am I one of those consumers who professes to be "really into gadgets", a preference I've always found weirdly unspecific. It's subtly telling when people claim to be into "gadgets", because they're never talking about, say, a tin opener.

How it works

  • What they really mean is something gimmicky and expensive that almost certainly requires the services of a datacentre and enough water to irrigate Kent.
  • Even if I were to surmount these two obstacles, you then get into the ethics of the thing.

Details worth keeping

Jonathan Liew is a Guardian columnist Continue reading...

Keep reading in the app

Open the app view to save this story, compare related coverage, and continue from the same source.

Open in app