Walesonline iconWalesonlineSep 1, 2026 ~5 min source read

All Blacks accused of provocative behaviour during Greatest Rivalry series; calls for World Rugby action

The four-Test series between New Zealand and South Africa is escalating off the field as accusations fly over tactical gamesmanship, media narratives and alleged attempts to influence officiating.

All Blacks accused over behaviour in South Africa after demand for World Rugby action

Share this story

Send the public story page.

Useful takeaways from this story.

Rassie Erasmus made late pre-match changes to South Africa's lineup that exploited the series' non-World Rugby status and drew scrutiny.

South African media and figures accuse the All Blacks and New Zealand press of an organised narrative and psychological tactics.

Calls have been made for World Rugby to act on perceived unethical conduct and on officiating protocols between coaches and referees.

# What happened With the four-Test series level at 1-1, friction between the Springboks and the All Blacks has intensified on and off the pitch. A physical incident involving Springbok Cheslin Kolbe and All Black Leroy Carter added heat to an already fraught matchup, and post-match exchanges between coaches widened the row.

# The key disputes

  • After the second Test in Cape Town, All Blacks coach Dave Rennie suggested South Africa's scrummaging had crossed legal lines. Rassie Erasmus responded angrily and defended tactical decisions his side made.
  • Erasmus admitted he swapped his named starting front row with the bench less than an hour before kickoff. That kind of late change would breach World Rugby rules in competitions it runs, but the Greatest Rivalry series is jointly organised by the teams and not overseen by SANZAAR or World Rugby, so Erasmus was not technically breaking tournament rules.
  • Critics say Erasmus exploited that loophole as gamesmanship. He has not ruled out making similar late changes in future matches of the series.

# Media and narrative accusations Former All Black Kieran Read called Erasmus "good at telling a story." New Zealand Herald correspondent Gregor Paul demanded World Rugby intervene over what he described as ethically questionable conduct by Erasmus. South African outlets and writers pushed back hard.

A Supersport piece by Brendan Nel accused the All Blacks of a concerted effort to unsettle the Springboks, crediting New Zealand's mental skills coach Gilbert Enoka with much of that work. Nel argued New Zealand media have run coordinated storylines portraying Erasmus as the villain and suggested refereeing decisions—specifically around the scrum in the second Test—favoured New Zealand.

Nel said the narrative looked orchestrated, claiming the All Blacks and sympathetic media "capitalised" on incidents and that this soured the series.

# Officiating and governance questions

# Practical implications for the series Both teams will share the same charter flight to the United States for the fourth Test in Baltimore. Erasmus said the teams often travel together and acknowledged the awkwardness of sitting on a long flight after a heated Test. The series moves to M&T Bank Stadium in Baltimore for the final match.

# What to watch next

  • Whether Erasmus repeats late team changes and whether World Rugby or the series organisers respond.
  • Any formal complaints lodged about refereeing, pre-match conduct, or media manipulation.
  • How on-field tensions develop in the next Test and whether sharing a flight affects relations between squads.

The story combines on-field incidents, tactical decisions that exploit organisational gaps, and a broader media war that is shaping public perception of both teams.

More context around this story.

Loading more related stories...

Keep reading in the app

Open the app view to save this story, compare related coverage, and continue from the same source.

Open in app