Taxfoundation iconTaxfoundationSep 2, 2026 ~7 min source read

Five Revenue Raisers From the Options Guide and What They Reveal About Tax Reform Trade‑Offs

Tax Foundation’s Options for Reforming America’s Tax Code 3.0 models dozens of tax changes and shows that choices that raise similar revenue can have very different economic and distributional effects. The guide emphasizes base broadening, simplicity, and neutrality as lower‑cost ways to raise revenue than large marginal rate increases or narrowly targeted credits.

What Five Revenue Raisers in the Options Guide Tell Us About Sound Tax Reform

Share this story

Send the public story page.

Useful takeaways from this story.

Broadening the tax base by taxing fringe benefits raises substantial revenue while causing smaller GDP and labor supply losses than equivalent top‑rate increases.

Not all revenue raisers are equal: neutrality and administrative simplicity matter for long‑run economic outcomes and the efficiency of the tax system.

The useful part

Foundation's new resource, Options for Reforming America's Tax Code 3.0: A Policymaker's Guide to Tax Reform Trade-Offs, models the economic, distributional, and revenue effects of 86 different changes to the tax code. Within the book are 52 options that would decrease federal budget deficits on a dynamic basis over 10 years. As annual deficits approach $2 trillion per year, policymakers in both parties may look to the tax code for revenue.

How it works

  • Two tax increases may raise similar amounts of revenue on a conventional basis, but one may harm the nation's economy more.
  • Consider two workers with the same $50,000 in total compensation—one earns it all in wages, and the other takes $2,000 of it in tax-free fringe benefits.
  • Although the two workers receive the same amount of compensation, the worker with fringe benefits pays less in taxes.
  • The top marginal rate increase results in a much larger decrease in gross domestic product (GDP) and a much greater reduction in work.
  • Broadening the tax base leads to a more neutral and transparent tax code and can raise similar amounts of revenue to marginal rate increases while doing much less damage to the nation's economy.

What to take from it

Eliminating SALT causes more economic harm because it would increase marginal tax rates on labor income, pass-through business income, and investment in owner-occupied housing. Some may make the tax code more complex or inefficient, while others make the tax code simpler and more neutral. While these benefits are popular with employees and employers, they make the tax code less neutral by favoring some types of compensation over others.

Example or evidence

  • A broad tax base reduces tax administration costs and allows more revenue to be raised at lower rates.
  • Compare this option to raising the top marginal individual income tax An individual income tax (or personal income tax) is levied on the wages, salaries, investments, or other forms of income an individual...
  • Though barely 100 years old, individual income taxes are the largest source rate to 50 percent.
  • Repeal the Low-Income Housing Tax Credit A tax credit is a provision that reduces a taxpayer's final tax bill, dollar-for-dollar.

Details worth keeping

Common examples include health insurance and retirement plan contributions, though many other so-called "fringe" benefits are also tax-free, including items like the use of on-site gyms, employer payments of student loans, or employee discounts. This option would eliminate the income tax exclusion for fringe benefits, meaning the value of these benefits would be included in an employee's taxable income Taxable income is the amount of income subject to tax, after deductions and exemptions. A narrow tax base is non-neutral and inefficient.

Related coverage

  • Taxfoundation: Congress has passed some major simplifying reforms in recent years, but the tax code has still grown more complex over the past few decades.
  • Taxfoundation: The "no tax on" deductions show the drawbacks of using narrowly tailored provisions to provide tax relief.
  • Itep: Lawmakers can use this moment to advance a more progressive and racially-just tax system by evaluating tax proposals across five dimensions: equity, adequacy and stability, simplicity, neutrality, and...
  • Itep: This new tool describes 28 ways the Commonwealth could generate substantial new revenue in a manner that would fall least heavily on people with the least ability to pay.
  • Visualcapitalist: More than $1 in every $10 of government spending goes to interest in some countries. See where debt costs are taking the biggest bite.

More context around this story.

Trump’s interest-rate fantasy runs into debt gravity
Theblaze iconTheblazeSep 7, 2026

Trump’s interest-rate fantasy runs into debt gravity

You can have very low interest rates, and you can have debt-driven inflation. You just can’t have both at the same time. That is the reality President Trump refuses to recognize. At the core of the president’s half-baked plan to resuscitate the economy is a return to the good old days of near-zero interest rates. The F

Loading more related stories...

Keep reading in the app

Open the app view to save this story, compare related coverage, and continue from the same source.

Open in app