Walesonline iconWalesonlineSep 3, 2026 ~5 min source read

FIFA accuses UEFA of a 'smear campaign' after legal bid over aborted World Cup investor plan

FIFA filed a response in US court calling UEFA’s requests for documents and testimony part of a prolonged public attack, arguing the disputed World Cup funding scheme was only a proposal that required member association approval.

FIFA blast UEFA over ‘smear campaign’ as explosive new statement is launched

Share this story

Send the public story page.

Useful takeaways from this story.

FIFA says UEFA launched a "weeks-long smear campaign" after publicly opposing FIFA’s proposed FIFA Forward Enterprise (FFE) investor plan.

FIFA maintains FFE was a conditional proposal needing majority member and FIFA Council approval, not an executed deal.

Public pressure has grown: former players and fans have demanded FIFA leadership changes amid the dispute.

After the plan was abandoned, UEFA moved to seek disclosure of documents and testimony in United States courts as part of possible Swiss criminal claims linked to the proposal. UEFA's submissions accused FIFA president Gianni Infantino of "criminal mismanagement" and alleged that off-market prices were promoted for personal benefit.

FIFA has filed its own court submission in the United States asking judges to reject UEFA's application by the end of September. The filing describes UEFA's legal actions as legally deficient and asserts a "fundamental defect" in UEFA's case.

FIFA's papers characterise UEFA's filings as extensions of public messaging rather than neutral legal pleadings. The organisation says several documents look like press releases supporting what FIFA calls a "weeks-long smear campaign" against FIFA and its leadership.

FIFA argues FFE was only a proposal that could have moved forward if the majority of FIFA member associations and the FIFA Council approved it. That position is central to FIFA's contention that UEFA's requests for disclosure are misplaced, because no binding transaction took place.

Context of wider criticism and leadership pressure

The dispute comes amid growing calls for change inside FIFA. A collective of former players, including Robert Pires and Juan Sebastian Veron, issued a public statement calling for stakeholders to step forward and reshape football governance. They said recent decisions were made without adequate consultation of players and fans and called for change in leadership.

  • Court timetable: FIFA requested a judicial decision on UEFA's application by the end of September. The immediate legal process will determine whether the US courts compel document disclosure.
  • Political fallout: The dispute has increased public scrutiny of FIFA leadership and may influence how federations, players, and fans view governance and transparency moving forward.

FIFA's court filing frames UEFA's legal moves as part of a broader public campaign rather than a strictly legal pursuit. UEFA's pursuit of documents follows a high-profile public confrontation over FFE. The US filings and any subsequent rulings will shape whether the dispute remains a public spat or produces enforceable disclosure that could feed further legal or regulatory action.

More context around this story.

Loading more related stories...

Keep reading in the app

Open the app view to save this story, compare related coverage, and continue from the same source.

Open in app