After the plan was abandoned, UEFA moved to seek disclosure of documents and testimony in United States courts as part of possible Swiss criminal claims linked to the proposal. UEFA's submissions accused FIFA president Gianni Infantino of "criminal mismanagement" and alleged that off-market prices were promoted for personal benefit.
FIFA has filed its own court submission in the United States asking judges to reject UEFA's application by the end of September. The filing describes UEFA's legal actions as legally deficient and asserts a "fundamental defect" in UEFA's case.
FIFA's papers characterise UEFA's filings as extensions of public messaging rather than neutral legal pleadings. The organisation says several documents look like press releases supporting what FIFA calls a "weeks-long smear campaign" against FIFA and its leadership.
FIFA argues FFE was only a proposal that could have moved forward if the majority of FIFA member associations and the FIFA Council approved it. That position is central to FIFA's contention that UEFA's requests for disclosure are misplaced, because no binding transaction took place.
Context of wider criticism and leadership pressure
The dispute comes amid growing calls for change inside FIFA. A collective of former players, including Robert Pires and Juan Sebastian Veron, issued a public statement calling for stakeholders to step forward and reshape football governance. They said recent decisions were made without adequate consultation of players and fans and called for change in leadership.
- Court timetable: FIFA requested a judicial decision on UEFA's application by the end of September. The immediate legal process will determine whether the US courts compel document disclosure.
- Political fallout: The dispute has increased public scrutiny of FIFA leadership and may influence how federations, players, and fans view governance and transparency moving forward.
FIFA's court filing frames UEFA's legal moves as part of a broader public campaign rather than a strictly legal pursuit. UEFA's pursuit of documents follows a high-profile public confrontation over FFE. The US filings and any subsequent rulings will shape whether the dispute remains a public spat or produces enforceable disclosure that could feed further legal or regulatory action.