A distinction between a Proper State and an Improper State clarifies how a government can become fiscally and institutionally untethered from its citizens by using narratives and institutional controls to replace market incentives with rent-seeking and paternalism.
Narrative strategy converts defensive negative rights into expansive positive social rights, making state coercion seem morally necessary and politically popular.
Practical effect: markets and individual responsibility are displaced by bureaucratic privilege, creating incentives for rent-seeking and long-term economic stagnation.
Latin American examples discussed: Peronism/kirchnerismo, Cuban blockade narrative, and the Bolivarian project illustrate how cultural and historical claims mask structural extraction.
# Overview
This essay draws a practical distinction between two types of states. A Proper State remains accountable to citizens and uses tax revenue for broadly approved public functions. An Improper State severs that accountability, enabling the state to survive and expand even as the governed grow poorer. The Improper State preserves itself by two concrete tools: control of public narratives and control of institutions.
# How the Improper State Maintains Power
When the state no longer needs broad public consent for fiscal survival, it replaces market incentives with bureaucratic privileges. Those privileges take the form of monopolies, direct control of production, state ownership of natural resources, and dominance over sectors such as education and health. Over time, the relationship between citizen and state inverts: citizens become supplicants seeking rents, and the state becomes the principal economic actor and beneficiary.
# Narratives
In practice, the narrative machine labels defenders of private enterprise and limited government as uncaring or exploitative. By establishing a moral dichotomy—state benevolence versus private greed—the state manufactures public expectations that it must provide for citizens' needs.
# Narrative Strategies in Latin America (Examples)
The essay uses Latin America to demonstrate how rhetoric masks extraction. Specific currents and examples mentioned include:
Local concepts and histories—such as indigenous ideas like sumak kawsay—can be co-opted into state narratives and repurposed as moral validation for centralized distribution.
# Consequences
As citizens grow accustomed to state provision, personal independence and responsibility decline. Political incentives favor expanding privileges for connected groups, intensifying bureaucratic capture and reducing economic dynamism.
# Practical Implications for Policy and Civic Life
The essay uses historical and regional examples rather than technical prescriptions, but its core claim is simple: when narrative control and institutional autonomy align, liberty and market mechanisms are replaced by an entrenched, rent-seeking apparatus.
It feels strange to write publicly in defense of not being public. I’m convinced that life’s most important activities almost always take place in spheres that are more or less private, where cameras are absent and nobody is reporting. Until quite recently, churches, classrooms, and family homes were just such sanctuar
This the third and final essay in a symposium on the common good. You can read the first essay by John G. Grove here and the second essay by Rachel Lu’s essay here. It is curious how “the common good,” when it bubbles into public discourse, always seems to be at the center of bitter […] The post Abusing Aristotle appea
The First Amendment is 45 words long, and for most of American history nobody was entirely sure what they meant. The Supreme Court did not squarely apply the Free Speech Clause against the states until 1925. The modern architecture of American speech protection—the doctrines governing incitement, defamation, prior rest
The dialectical battle between traditionalists and lovers of liberty has given us brilliant debates over the past few centuries, but also countless missed opportunities. The battle for freedom must be fought continuously, because whenever it is not being fought, freedom retreats; it is always under threat. We see this
In 2012, I visited Hong Kong and Macau. Among the many examples of industrial might, such as shipyards and grandiose buildings like the Hong Kong airport, two of the things that impressed me the most were a real estate complex in Macau and the bridge, then under construction, between Macau and Hong Kong. I remember […]
Loading more related stories...
Open the app view to save this story, compare related coverage, and continue from the same source.