Spicyip iconSpicyipSep 7, 2026

SpicyIP Weekly Review (31 August- 6 September)

Kicking off September with an exciting week featuring posts on the latest guidelines by the Patent Office on the use of AI in patent examination, copyright strikes, the Calcutta High Court order in IPRS v. Hotel Appolo, the Copyright Office's decision in the Thaler-Dabus case, and the Delhi High Court order in Hindustan Unilever Limited v Kwick Living.

SpicyIP Weekly Review (31 August- 6 September)

Share this story

Send the public story page.

Useful takeaways from this story.

Kicking off September with an exciting week featuring posts on the latest guidelines by the Patent Office on the use of AI in patent examination, copyright strikes, the Calcutta High Court order in IPRS v.

Hotel Appolo, the Copyright Office's decision in the Thaler-Dabus case, and the Delhi High Court order in Hindustan Unilever Limited v Kwick Living.

This and much more in this week's SpicyIP Weekly Review.

Building the complete brief

The page is ready to read now. The fuller skim-friendly version will appear here automatically.

The useful part

Kicking off September with an exciting week featuring posts on the latest guidelines by the Patent Office on the use of AI in patent examination, copyright strikes, the Calcutta High Court order in IPRS v. Hotel Appolo, the Copyright Office's decision in the Thaler-Dabus case, and the Delhi High Court order in Hindustan Unilever Limited v Kwick Living. This and much more in this week's SpicyIP Weekly Review.

Details worth keeping

This and much more in this week's SpicyIP Weekly Review. Analysing the Copyright Office's Decision […]

Keep reading in the app

Open the app view to save this story, compare related coverage, and continue from the same source.

Open in app