# What happened The 53rd General Assembly of the Presbyterian Church in America (PCA) voted to disapprove Overture 37. The overture, submitted by Pacific Presbytery, asked to amend the Book of Church Order (BCO) to allow local Sessions to decide whether qualified women should be allowed to serve as deacons.
A commission of five teaching elders—Ligon Duncan, David Garner, Thomas Gibbs, Jonathan Master, and Guy Waters—was appointed by the moderator to formulate an official answer to that dissent. Their response has been published and will be included in the Assembly's minutes.
# What the dissent says
# How the General Assembly answered The Assembly's response answers on three fronts: exegetical, historical, and constitutional.
- Constitution and polity: The response asserts that, according to the BCO, the office of deacon is open to men only (BCO 7-2). The Assembly maintains that its constitutional documents are biblically faithful and sufficient for settling the question of women holding the deacon's office.
- Sessions to select and appoint men and women to assist the deacons in diaconal ministry to the extent Scripture allows (BCO 9-7), so the Assembly sees existing polity as accommodating certain forms of female diaconal participation without altering the constitutional definition of the office.
- Closure under BCO procedures: The answer notes that when a dissent is filed and the church files an official answer, the procedural rule in BCO 45-5 indicates the matter ends there. The Assembly's answer will be entered into the minutes accordingly.
# What changes, if any, this produces No change to the BCO is recorded in the Assembly's answer. The Assembly reaffirmed its vote to deny Overture 37 and provided a formal, documented rebuttal to the dissenting elders' arguments. The Assembly's published answer becomes the official response and part of the Assembly's record.
# Why this matters to PCA members
# Next steps The Assembly's answer is now part of the official minutes. Because BCO 45-5 states that the matter concludes when the court answers a dissent, this action closes the procedural path on this specific dissent at the General Assembly level.