Jmir iconJmirSep 9, 2026 ~1 min source read

Integrating Lymph Node Metastasis and Programmed Death-Ligand 1 Prediction in Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer From a Single PET/CT Scan: Multicenter Radiomics Study

Following rigorous feature selection, 2 independent models were developed using machine learning and tested on a temporal validation cohort (n=45). Model performance was benchmarked against clinicopathological models and nuclear medicine physicians.

Share this story

Send the public story page.

Useful takeaways from this story.

Following rigorous feature selection, 2 independent models were developed using machine learning and tested on a temporal validation cohort (n=45).

Model performance was benchmarked against clinicopathological models and nuclear medicine physicians.

Critically, we found no significant correlation between the radiomic signatures of LNM and PD-L1, which validates our 2-model approach.

Building the complete brief

The page is ready to read now. The fuller skim-friendly version will appear here automatically.

The useful part

Following rigorous feature selection, 2 independent models were developed using machine learning and tested on a temporal validation cohort (n=45). Model performance was benchmarked against clinicopathological models and nuclear medicine physicians. Critically, we found no significant correlation between the radiomic signatures of LNM and PD-L1, which validates our 2-model approach.

How it works

  • The integrated model for LNM prediction (PT-IPT-LR) achieved an area under the curve of 0.845 (95% CI 0.716‐0.973) in the temporal validation cohort, with a sensitivity of 0.765 (95% CI 0.518‐1.000) and a...

Details worth keeping

Preoperative stratification for non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) necessitates separate evaluations of lymph node metastasis (LNM) to guide surgical decisions and of programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression to inform immunotherapy. The model for PD-L1 expression (PT-IPT-SVM) achieved an area under the curve of 0.776 (95% CI 0.641‐0.911) in the temporal validation cohort, with a sensitivity of 0.800 (95% CI 0.609‐0.991) and a specificity of 0.650 (95% CI 0.401‐0.899). Decision curve analysis confirmed the clinical utility of both models.

Keep reading in the app

Open the app view to save this story, compare related coverage, and continue from the same source.

Open in app