If Australia stopped importing and the former trade partners can't sell to Australia what they desire to sell to Australia do you still think people are better off if the situation escalates into a miliary conflict? My point is that exports are costs to a country and imports are benefits regardless of how nations respond to a nation's trade policy.
If Australia stopped importing and the former trade partners can't sell to Australia what they desire to sell to Australia do you still think people are better off if the situation escalates into a miliary...
My point is that exports are costs to a country and imports are benefits regardless of how nations respond to a nation's trade policy.
Also, you are supposing that countries should not export because exports are costs.
The page is ready to read now. The fuller skim-friendly version will appear here automatically.
If Australia stopped importing and the former trade partners can't sell to Australia what they desire to sell to Australia do you still think people are better off if the situation escalates into a miliary conflict? My point is that exports are costs to a country and imports are benefits regardless of how nations respond to a nation's trade policy. Also, you are supposing that countries should not export because exports are costs.
Open the app view to save this story, compare related coverage, and continue from the same source.