A national school choice organization that spent more than $6 million in 2026 to defend Arizona's Empowerment Scholarship Account (ESA) program is shifting its strategy. The group plans to press Republican legislators and the governor's office to pass bipartisan legislation designed to make the ESA program politically durable.
The advocacy group's 2026 spending indicates it remains a major player in Arizona education politics. Its stated aim is not to expand immediately but to seek reforms that could reduce political vulnerability and keep the ESA program intact through future legal and electoral challenges.
Inside the Republican coalition there is a split. Some Republican leaders favor negotiating compromises with Democratic lawmakers and the governor to codify changes that would lessen the chance of successful repeal or ballot challenges. Other Republicans, especially members of the Freedom Caucus, push back on that approach. They view outside national groups and bipartisan deals skeptically and prefer maintaining a more hard-line posture on school choice.
The dispute comes after multiple attempts related to ESAs in 2026 failed to reach voters or passed legal tests. Two propositions aiming to change the ESA program did not qualify for the ballot, leaving elected officials, not voters, to settle the program's future for now. That dynamic increases the importance of legislative maneuvering and executive action.
What legislators and the governor must decide
Lawmakers and the governor's office face trade-offs. A bipartisan reform could secure the ESA program by addressing concerns that motivated repeal efforts, but it would require compromise on policy details and political messaging. Standing firm without compromise risks continued ballot fights and legal challenges that could destabilize the program again.
Expect the advocacy group to push specific legislative language or negotiating frameworks to protect ESAs. Lawmakers who want a negotiated fix will need to find middle ground acceptable to both Republican majorities and the governor's office. Freedom Caucus resistance means any deal could face intraparty opposition in the Legislature.