Checking in on Delaware developments
Franklin, VC Will concluded that a take-private involving a conflicted director and conflicted CEO did not satisfy the safe harbors of DGCL 144 and therefore could be the subject of a shareholder fiduciary claim. The case is generally interesting as one of the early interpretations of the new safe harbors, and in particular, the 144(a)(2) safe harbor, concerning the cleansing effect of a shareholder vote.