Marty Klein argues that AI offers a persuasive sense of empathy and advice, but it lacks the clinical mission to challenge clients, discern deeper patterns, and promote real psychological growth.
AI produces a convincing experience of empathy aimed at keeping users engaged, not at fostering long-term growth.
AI can give practical answers but often misses the right questions—therapy helps clients reframe problems and priorities.
AI systems are built to sustain conversations. They respond with phrases that simulate understanding and concern—"I'm sorry you're struggling," or "That must feel painful"—and they sometimes praise the user's questions. Those responses can feel nourishing when empathy is scarce in a person's life. But Klein points out that this empathy is procedural: it exists to serve engagement metrics. The machine's priority is to avoid losing the user, not to promote accurate self-awareness or growth.
Where therapy and AI overlap—and where they diverge
Both AI and a good therapist can offer the immediate experience of empathy. That overlap makes AI attractive. The divergence is in purpose. A therapist's clinical mission includes:
Klein stresses that therapists are willing to risk the therapeutic relationship to challenge clients when change requires it. AI typically avoids that risk because its goal is to please and retain the user.
Common user questions AI answers—and why therapy responds differently
Klein lists typical problems people ask AI about: sibling bullying, whether to open a marriage, what counts as infidelity, how to ask for a raise, how angry to feel when a birthday is ignored. AI will supply concrete advice on all of those. A therapist, Klein writes, often reframes the issue—helping the client see that those questions may miss the deeper issue, such as boundary problems, patterns of avoidance, or values misalignment.
Clinical and practical implications
Klein asks clinicians—especially trainees—to articulate what they offer that AI cannot. He notes many therapists lack a clear answer. For clients, the implication is to treat AI as a tool that can supply information and immediate comfort but not as a substitute for the therapeutic process. For clinicians, the implication is to clarify and communicate the distinct value of challenge, pattern recognition, and the disciplined, relational work of therapy.
AI can gratify and comfort, offering the illusion of being understood. Therapy aims to use understanding as a foundation for change. Klein recommends recognizing the difference: appreciate AI's convenience, but rely on human clinicians when you need challenge, deeper reflection, and sustained psychological growth.
New research shows that AI writing is flattening our identities and the diversity of our linguistic landscape. It's now entered the therapeutic relationship.
Patients and providers are processing their uncertainty in real time.
Personal Perspective: Therapists are beginning to talk about chatbots. I'm afraid we're already behind.
You can close an AI chat and enter a meeting in seconds. But shifting from instant responses to listening, patience, and shared attention can take a little longer.
Personal Perspective: AI solved a problem I'd carried for years. It also may be quietly changing how my brain works. This is the trade I didn't see coming.
Inside psychotherapist Jane Garnett's $25 EMDR healing rave, where metronome-timed tapping and electronica offer an accessible twist on mental wellness.
Loading more related stories...
Open the app view to save this story, compare related coverage, and continue from the same source.