Spicyip iconSpicyipSep 11, 2026

Unpacking Copyright Strikes, Safe Harbour and Due Diligence under the IT Rules : Part 2

In continuation of Part 1, this Part tests the arguments run by the Platforms where they state that – striking content upon complaint and terminating accounts with repeated complaints is due diligence which the IT Act and Rules requires. It covered removal "under clause (b) on a voluntary basis" and removal on grievances under sub-rule (2).

Unpacking Copyright Strikes, Safe Harbour and Due Diligence under the IT Rules : Part 2

Share this story

Send the public story page.

Useful takeaways from this story.

It covered removal "under clause (b) on a voluntary basis" and removal on grievances under sub-rule (2).

In continuation of Part 1, this Part tests the arguments run by the Platforms where they state that – striking content upon complaint and terminating accounts with repeated complaints is due diligence which...

Building the complete brief

The page is ready to read now. The fuller skim-friendly version will appear here automatically.

The useful part

It covered removal "under clause (b) on a voluntary basis" and removal on grievances under sub-rule (2). In continuation of Part 1, this Part tests the arguments run by the Platforms where they state that – striking content upon complaint and terminating accounts with repeated complaints is due diligence which the IT Act and Rules requires.

Details worth keeping

In continuation of Part 1, this Part tests the arguments run by the Platforms where they state that – striking content upon complaint and terminating accounts with repeated complaints is due diligence which the IT Act and Rules requires.

Keep reading in the app

Open the app view to save this story, compare related coverage, and continue from the same source.

Open in app