Professor Robert Long argues that the “1% safer” message is a rebranding of familiar safety ideas—zero-harm rhetoric, Swiss-cheese, and incremental prevention—wrapped in new imagery but lacking new methods.
“1% safer” is presented as incrementalism that repackages existing zero-harm and Swiss-cheese thinking rather than introducing new methodology.
Without a shift in methodology and critical thinking, rebranded safety slogans will circulate in a compliance-oriented industry that resists deeper discourse.
# The claim
Professor Robert Long questions the substance behind the "1% safer" slogan and its cousin campaigns such as "Zero in 100 Days." He warns that changing the label without changing the underlying method creates the appearance of progress while keeping the same assumptions and tactics.
# What the slogan does
According to Long, "1% safer" uses incremental language to disguise the same prevention-focused worldview that has dominated safety thinking for decades. The campaign's imagery—Jenga blocks and a mouse—links it back to the Swiss-cheese model and other linear metaphors for blocking failures. That link, he says, makes the new slogan a cosmetic rebrand rather than a substantive innovation.
# Why this matters
Safety discourse and practice are shaped by how problems are framed. If new slogans only restate old goals in friendlier or less objectionable terms, organizations will keep applying the same tools: compliance, barrier bolstering, and prevention-by-blocking. Those tools are attractive to managers and vendors because they are easy to market, easy to measure superficially, and fit a compliance mindset that discourages critical analysis.
# The methodological gap
Long asks whether there is any novel methodology under the "1% safer" banner. His answer: no. He situates incremental safety within the lineage of resilience engineering and S2 thinking and argues those ideas have been repackaged rather than replaced. Without a genuine change in methods—how risks are analyzed, how performance is studied, how human contribution is treated—new slogans will not shift outcomes.
# The marketing problem
Rebrands succeed because they are easy to sell to an industry that favors visible commitments and measurable slogans. "1% safer" promises a clear, digestible metric and an implied path to zero. That combination is appealing despite ambiguity about what "1%" actually means in practice: per day, per month, per year, or as an abstract rhetorical device. The vagueness makes the slogan flexible for messaging but weak as a guide to action.
# The call for critical thinking
Long's core practical point is that safety professionals should look under the symbolism. Ask whether a campaign changes assumptions, methods, or measurement in ways that alter how safety work is done. If not, treat the campaign as branding and focus scarce attention and resources on methodological change: different ways to analyze incidents, to engage workers, and to design systems that move beyond barrier metaphors.
# Bottom line
"1% safer" is presented as incremental progress but, in Long's view, retreads established safety narratives. If organizations want change, they need more than new labels—they need new methods and the willingness to question the existing, compliance-friendly consensus.
Waymo has published another update on the safety benefits of its robotaxi service. The company says it has now logged more than 300 human lifetimes of driving, and that the safety benefits are clear already. Across Waymo’s 270 million miles of fully autonomous driving, the company says that injuries to ... [continued]
New research shows why security teams must track where workforce risk moves and respond to its underlying cause
 Mastering Risk Assessment & Risk Management! 📋🚨 Do you know the exact steps to manage workplace hazards effectively? A solid safety system isn't just about spotting hazards—it's about understanding likelihood vs. severity, evaluating current controls, and reviewing them regularly.  Here’s a quick guide co
As the mining sector continues to pursue zero harm, the industry has recorded progress in terms of health and safety despite challenges. Speaking at the Mine Health and Safety Summit, on September 17, Mineral and Petroleum Resources Minister Gwede Mantashe highlighted that the industry recorded 42 fatalities in 2024, m
Loading more related stories...
Open the app view to save this story, compare related coverage, and continue from the same source.
