Theplaylist iconTheplaylistSep 15, 2026 ~7 min source read

Future Tense reframes time travel as a colonial reckoning at TIFF

Jenna Cato Bass uses a familiar sci‑fi device to ask who gets to imagine altering the past, shifting questions about time travel from heroics to race, class, and historical responsibility.

‘Future Tense’ Review: Jenna Cato Bass Reimagines Time Travel As A Provocative Colonial Reckoning [TIFF]

Share this story

Send the public story page.

Useful takeaways from this story.

Future Tense uses time travel to foreground racial and economic power: the film reframes the act of changing the past as a question about who benefits and who is allowed to imagine impossible fixes.

# What the film does differently Jenna Cato Bass's Future Tense takes time travel — a well-worn science fiction trope — and redirects it toward a political and social argument. Rather than foregrounding spectacle or a single moral dilemma, the film asks whose history such technology would be used to rewrite and why those choices matter. Bass frames time travel as a tool whose ethical implications change depending on the user's perspective and social position.

# Whose past, whose rescue

# Tone and ambitions The review describes Future Tense as heady and speculative. Bass treats the premise as an ethical laboratory rather than a vehicle for action-thriller set pieces. That approach keeps the story focused on moral complexity and political argument. The film's ambition lies in making time travel serve argument and interrogation: who is allowed to imagine the past, and for what ends?

# Performances and perspective Lawrence Maleka is named as the central actor, playing Lwando, the character who reframes the canonical time-travel remedy. Kristen Raath is listed among the cast in the story metadata. The review suggests Bass intentionally centers a Black perspective to recalibrate familiar genre instincts.

# Festival context

# Why the film matters for viewers If you watch genre films to see new moral problems rather than new mechanics, Future Tense offers a reason to pay attention. It challenges viewers who take the standard 'prevent one monstrous figure' thought experiment as the outer limit of historical redress. The film instead raises questions about who gets to decide which pasts are worth changing and what kinds of justice technological interventions could — or should — pursue.

Expect a provocative, argument-driven sci‑fi film that privileges ideas and perspective over spectacle. The review frames it as intellectually ambitious and politically charged. For festival audiences and critics, Future Tense adds to a wave of films reframing colonial and historical narratives within genre frameworks.

# Bottom line Jenna Cato Bass's Future Tense retools time travel to examine colonial and racial stakes. The film pushes beyond the familiar 'kill-one-tyrant' fantasy to ask who benefits when we imagine rewriting history, and what kinds of pasts audiences and storytellers habitually ignore.

More context around this story.

Loading more related stories...

Keep reading in the app

Open the app view to save this story, compare related coverage, and continue from the same source.

Open in app