Dougwils iconDougwilsSep 15, 2026 ~8 min source read

Letters to Cleanse the Palate — Reader Responses on Ancient Technology, Revelation, and More

A round-up of letters and commentary collected by Douglas Wilson touching on the purported advanced technology of pre-Flood peoples, dating Revelation, and several other theological and cultural questions.

Share this story

Send the public story page.

Useful takeaways from this story.

Several correspondents argue that pre-Flood civilizations could have had technologies comparable to—or exceeding—modern capabilities, and propose coastal settlement and subsequent submergence as a reason for scarce physical evidence.

Entropy is offered as a practical explanation for why ancient machinery and structures no longer survive intact, not as a reason to dismiss ancient sophistication.

The letters cover a wide set of short topics beyond ancient technology, including biblical interpretation, church practice, and cultural observations.

This post collects reader letters and Wilson's brief replies across a range of short topics. The largest thread concerns whether pre-Flood (antediluvian) humans could have possessed advanced technologies and why physical traces of such technologies are scarce today.

Ancient Technology and Missing Evidence

Multiple correspondents suggest that antediluvians might have had capabilities we associate with modern engineering: wireless power, heavier-than-air flight, advanced engines, mastery of electromagnetic phenomena, and safe fusion. These claims are presented as plausible rather than provable. Entropy is introduced as a practical reason for disappearance: slow, destructive physical processes—rust, collapse, burial—would erase complex machinery over millennia.

Correspondents also propose that ancient populations concentrated along coasts and continental shelves that are now submerged. That relocation of former shorelines is offered as a partial explanation for the scarcity of intact artifacts.

Other Short Topics in the Letter Thread

The post lists several other short topics and letters, indicating a broader conversation: "Under the Ban," "Loser Theology," "When to Admonish?," "AI Stuff," "A Wayward Daughter," "The Ethics of Self-Defense," "Lewis and Tolkien on Divorce," "Plastic Surgery?," "Wokeness and Women," "Yes, They Do," "Baptists and Infant Baptism," and "More on Smashmouth." These appear as content markers or section headers rather than expanded essays in this collection.

Two quoted lines are brought into the thread as literary reflections: "Man is the wreckage of something great, not the rising of something inferior" (Donald Grey Barnhouse) and "Aristotle is but the wreck of Adam and Athens is but the rubbish of an Eden" (Robert South). They are used to frame the idea that present human condition carries traces of a once-greater state.

The correspondence is informal, anecdotal, and speculative. Writers mix theological reflection, historical citations, humor, and imagination. The overall intention is to stimulate conversation rather than to assert new historical or archaeological claims.

Readers interested in the intersection of faith, biblical history, and cultural observation will find these letters reflective of a community that entertains speculative reconstructions of the past while citing early Christian sources to ground certain interpretive positions. The collection stresses plausible explanations—coastal submergence and entropy—for why physical evidence could be sparse even if ancient societies were technologically capable.

More context around this story.

Dougwils iconDougwilsSep 22, 2026

Letters to Delight and Inform

Welcome to CN?: The closing line of JD Greer’s ‘Why I’m Not a Christian Nationalist’ in TGC.“So, to paraphrase Roger Williams, give me as much Christianity as possible in our government and as little government authority as possible over my Christianity.”Um. I think you just articulated the goals of Christian Nationali

Dougwils iconDougwilsSep 1, 2026

Letters on the DoorSept, I Mean Doorstep

Why the Animus?: Would you please share with us who deeply appreciate your ministry and the whole CREC/Moscow Mood, what you think fuels the gut reaction against all this by the “standard bearers” in the reformed world?I say “gut reaction” because I find most of the criticisms ill-informed but nearly rising to the leve

Loading more related stories...

Keep reading in the app

Open the app view to save this story, compare related coverage, and continue from the same source.

Open in app