Interestingly, they are not proposing to do that, and in fact, they're leaning in to the zero-slate contest as a viable option that partially justifies the loss of 14a-8. What they are proposing to do is amend Rule 14a-4, to make zero-slate contests less procedurally threatening to the company.
Interestingly, they are not proposing to do that, and in fact, they're leaning in to the zero-slate contest as a viable option that partially justifies the loss of 14a-8.
What they are proposing to do is amend Rule 14a-4, to make zero-slate contests less procedurally threatening to the company.
As a result, companies facing zero-slate contests have voluntarily included the propo...
The page is ready to read now. The fuller skim-friendly version will appear here automatically.
Interestingly, they are not proposing to do that, and in fact, they're leaning in to the zero-slate contest as a viable option that partially justifies the loss of 14a-8. What they are proposing to do is amend Rule 14a-4, to make zero-slate contests less procedurally threatening to the company. As a result, companies facing zero-slate contests have voluntarily included the propo...
First, Mike Levin and I did a whole podcast on what would happen if the SEC proposed to rescind 14a-8, and one thing we speculated on was whether the SEC would try to tweak the rules to block "zero slate" proxy contests at the same time.
Open the app view to save this story, compare related coverage, and continue from the same source.