Following a hearing with NCPCR, Meta acknowledged mistakes in handling child sexual abuse material (CSAM). The government pressed the company on its intermediary 'safe harbour' protections and secured a commitment to notify authorities promptly.
Meta acknowledged errors before the NCPCR and agreed to promptly report child sexual abuse material to Indian authorities.
Indian authorities told Meta it cannot indefinitely rely on intermediary 'safe harbour' immunity under Section 79 of the IT Act if it fails to meet legal obligations.
# What happened Meta officials appeared before the National Commission for Protection of Child Rights (NCPCR) after allegations surfaced about advertisements linked to child sexual exploitation and abuse material on its platforms. Company representatives admitted lapses in how they handled such material and gave commitments about improving reporting to Indian authorities.
# Why the government pushed back
# What Meta agreed to do Meta agreed to immediately report child sexual abuse material (CSAM) to the relevant Indian authorities. Officials said the company assured the commission that it would promptly notify law enforcement when such material is identified.
# What the authorities demanded The commission pressed Meta for proof of compliance with Indian law and precedent. NCPCR asked for evidence that the company is fulfilling its duties under the IT Act, POCSO, and the Supreme Court's direction on CSAM. NCPCR also emphasised that platforms must remove CSAM that could contribute to self-harm or suicide among children.
# Next steps and process
# Possible consequences Officials warned that failing to meet legal obligations can put Meta's intermediary safe harbour protection at risk. While the government can challenge an intermediary's claim to immunity, any formal loss of safe harbour could be contested by the company in court. The government signalled a tougher stance on platforms that fail to proactively identify and remove harmful content affecting children.
The meeting followed earlier summonses and media reports that prompted the NCPCR inquiry. Other outlets have reported related developments, including government insistence that platforms take proactive steps to protect children online and that Meta previously routed some CSAM reports through a US-based agency rather than directly to Indian authorities.
# What to watch for next Expect NCPCR's questionnaire and Meta's responses to shape the next hearing. Authorities may seek documentary proof of policy changes, reporting pipelines to Indian law enforcement, and evidence that recommendation and advertising systems do not enable harmful exposure to minors. If NCPCR remains unsatisfied, it could pursue actions that test the scope of intermediary immunity under Indian law.
The government will take action against platforms that fail to take proactive steps to ensure children's safety online, the sources said, underlining its tough stance on platforms' responsibility to protect minors from harmful content and activity.
Images of real children—including a member of a European royal family—were used to create some of the 350 ads containing child sexual abuse. Lawmakers say they plan to investigate.
Meta has agreed to report cases of child sexual abuse and other child-safety concerns to Indian law enforcement agencies, government sources said Tuesday, as part of a wider crackdown on social media platforms over the protection of children online. The decision by Facebook and Instagram’s parent company comes after ye
Until Now, It Routed Such Reports Through US-Based Agency
NCPCR has now decided to institute an inquiry to determine the facts of the matter and in continuation of the same, summoned the MD and Head of Meta India to appear before it on Wednesday
Loading more related stories...
Open the app view to save this story, compare related coverage, and continue from the same source.