Taxfoundation iconTaxfoundationSep 17, 2026 ~7 min source read

Federal Healthcare Subsidies and Tax Carveouts Are Driving Rapid Budget Growth

Federal spending and tax preferences for health care now account for nearly half of national health spending and are pushing the budget toward unsustainable deficits and rising debt.

The Spiraling Cost of Federal Healthcare Subsidies and Carveouts

Share this story

Send the public story page.

Useful takeaways from this story.

Federal health spending and tax expenditures totaled about $2.7 trillion in 2025, equal to 8.9% of GDP, and are projected to rise to roughly 9.7% of GDP by 2035.

The exclusion for employer‑sponsored insurance and other tax preferences cost over $500 billion annually, making health care the most heavily tax‑favored sector.

Unchecked growth in health spending is a principal driver of rising deficits and debt: CBO projects deficits and debt held by the public will increase substantially under current law.

# What the numbers show Federal healthcare spending—both direct program outlays and tax preferences—has grown into a dominant item on the federal ledger. In 2025, the government spent $2.18 trillion on health care, equal to 31.2 percent of the federal budget and 7.2 percent of GDP. Add in more than $500 billion a year in tax expenditures for the health sector, and the combined fiscal cost of health spending and tax carveouts reached about $2.7 trillion in 2025, or 8.9 percent of GDP.

# Why this matters for the budget

# How the federal government shapes health coverage Major federal healthcare programs—Medicare, Medicaid, ACA subsidies, and CHIP—are the largest and fastest-growing spending categories. When you include smaller programs and tax preferences, nearly half of all national health expenditures flow through federal programs or are influenced by federal tax policy. That means federal fiscal decisions now determine a large share of how Americans obtain and pay for health care.

# Tax preferences and market distortions Treasury and Joint Committee estimates show the largest health-sector tax preference is the exclusion for employer‑sponsored insurance. These tax provisions cost the Treasury hundreds of billions annually and skew behavior: employers often shift compensation into tax‑favored benefits instead of wages, and coverage tends to remain tied to employment rather than portable alternatives or direct payments. Those incentives affect labor markets, insurance design, and the allocation of health resources.

# Trajectory and policy implications

Policymakers face a choice: accept larger deficits and higher debt, or change federal health spending and tax rules. The report emphasizes that reforms to spending and tax preferences are central to restoring fiscal balance because healthcare is the largest and fastest‑growing component of federal outlays.

# Immediate context and recent developments The analysis comes as ACA subsidy levels and other temporary measures have shifted in recent years, affecting enrollment and federal outlays. News and policy actions in 2026—including adjustments to subsidies and program integrity efforts—underscore how changes in federal policy can quickly alter enrollment, costs, and budget projections.

# Bottom line Federal health programs plus tax preferences now account for a very large and rising share of federal fiscal commitments. Because these policies affect both spending and economic behavior, they are a central lever for any effort to put the federal budget on a more sustainable path.

More context around this story.

Loading more related stories...

Keep reading in the app

Open the app view to save this story, compare related coverage, and continue from the same source.

Open in app