Retained search involves an upfront fee for a committed, structured hiring engagement, while contingency search pays only when a candidate is successfully placed. Recruiterflow's time-to-fill benchmark analysis found that retained searches convert 77.9% of shortlisted candidates to interviews, compared with 44.3% for contingency searches, reflecting the...
Retained search involves an upfront fee for a committed, structured hiring engagement, while contingency search pays only when a candidate is successfully placed.
Recruiterflow's time-to-fill benchmark analysis found that retained searches convert 77.9% of shortlisted candidates to interviews, compared with 44.3% for contingency searches, reflecting the...
The page is ready to read now. The fuller skim-friendly version will appear here automatically.
Retained search involves an upfront fee for a committed, structured hiring engagement, while contingency search pays only when a candidate is successfully placed. Recruiterflow's time-to-fill benchmark analysis found that retained searches convert 77.9% of shortlisted candidates to interviews, compared with 44.3% for contingency searches, reflecting the... Payment timing is only the most visible difference.
Payment timing is only the most visible difference.
Open the app view to save this story, compare related coverage, and continue from the same source.