Supplychain247 iconSupplychain247Sep 16, 2026 ~2 min source read

How Mariani Reduced Artwork Risk by Centralizing Packaging Workflows

Mariani Packing Company moved from manual artwork processes to a centralized digital system to improve productivity, collaboration, version control and regulatory compliance for 100+ SKUs across multiple banners.

How Can Digital Artwork Workflows Reduce Compliance Risk?

Share this story

Send the public story page.

Useful takeaways from this story.

Centralizing artwork and approvals replaces disparate manual processes and improves version control for many SKUs.

A governed digital workflow captures approval histories and revisions, which supports regulatory and private-label requirements.

Central systems accelerate collaboration and speed to market while reducing the compliance and traceability gaps inherent in file-based workflows.

# Why Mariani rethought artwork management

Mariani Packing Company manages packaging artwork for more than 100 product SKUs sold internationally and under multiple banners. That scale creates repeated pressure on artwork processes: regulatory compliance, private-label customer requirements, and the need for speed to market.

As the product portfolio grew, manual and fragmented workflows became harder to sustain. Files moved between people and systems, approvals were tracked inconsistently, and producing new or revised artwork required more time and coordination than the business wanted.

# What Mariani changed

Mariani replaced manual artwork processes with a centralized, digital artwork workflow built by Loftware. The shift focused on three practical problems:

  • Single source for artwork and templates to limit version confusion.
  • Digital approval routing and recorded revision histories for traceability.
  • A scalable process that supports multiple banners and private-label clients.

# Concrete benefits described

Centralization reduced the operational friction of managing many product SKUs. A governed workflow made it easier to see who approved what and when, and to retrieve past revisions. That combination addresses both productivity and compliance: teams spend less time reconciling files and more time doing value work, while the organization gains an auditable trail needed for regulatory and customer requirements.

# How governance aids compliance

Packaging artwork must meet regulatory labels, claims, and client specifications. Storing art in a single governed environment ties content to approval metadata and revision history. Those records help reconstruct decision paths and demonstrate that the right reviewers signed off before materials went to market. For companies dealing with multiple regulators and private-label partners, that traceability matters for audits and dispute resolution.

# Collaboration and speed to market

# Version control and risk reduction

# Practical markers for teams evaluating this approach

  • Inventory your SKU and banner complexity. The higher the count and the more external customer requirements, the greater the value of centralization.
  • Map approval steps and where current handoffs fail to record decisions. Choose a workflow that captures reviewer identities and timestamps.
  • Prioritize systems that couple governed templates with live version histories so downstream teams always pull the approved file.

# Bottom line

For Mariani, consolidating artwork, approvals, and revision histories into a governed digital workflow addressed productivity bottlenecks while improving compliance posture. The shift reduced reliance on manual file sharing, provided auditable approval trails, and offered clearer version control across an expanding SKU set.

More context around this story.

Loading more related stories...

Keep reading in the app

Open the app view to save this story, compare related coverage, and continue from the same source.

Open in app