Blogspot iconBlogspotSep 17, 2026 ~1 min source read

Craig on Thomism and divine simplicity, Part I

In an earlier article, I discussed William Lane Craig's treatment of the kalām cosmological argument in Volume IIb of his Systematic Philosophical Theology. Let's now take a look at Volume IIa, which is devoted to the divine attributes.

Craig on Thomism and divine simplicity, Part I

Share this story

Send the public story page.

Useful takeaways from this story.

In an earlier article, I discussed William Lane Craig's treatment of the kalām cosmological argument in Volume IIb of his Systematic Philosophical Theology.

Let's now take a look at Volume IIa, which is devoted to the divine attributes.

Specifically, I'll address what he has to say about Thomism and the doctrine of divine simplicity.

Building the complete brief

The page is ready to read now. The fuller skim-friendly version will appear here automatically.

The useful part

In an earlier article, I discussed William Lane Craig's treatment of the kalām cosmological argument in Volume IIb of his Systematic Philosophical Theology. Let's now take a look at Volume IIa, which is devoted to the divine attributes. Specifically, I'll address what he has to say about Thomism and the doctrine of divine simplicity.

How it works

  • This is part of a larger discussion of the doctrine, but I'll confine what I say in this two-part article to his treatment of the Thomistic position, for two reasons.
  • The first is the practical one of keeping these posts to a manageable length.
  • The second is that, as a Thomist, I think the Thomistic approach to the issue is the most plausible and important.

Keep reading in the app

Open the app view to save this story, compare related coverage, and continue from the same source.

Open in app