Multiplesclerosisnewstoday iconMultiplesclerosisnewstodaySep 17, 2026 ~7 min source read

Study: Higher rates of C-sections before 39 weeks in people with MS are driven by standard obstetric reasons, not MS itself

A review of electronic health records found early, medically indicated cesarean deliveries were more common among pregnancies in people with multiple sclerosis, but most reasons given were typical obstetric issues; MS was rarely listed as the direct cause.

MS not behind higher early C-section rates in patients, study says

Share this story

Send the public story page.

Useful takeaways from this story.

Early C-sections (before 39 weeks) occurred more often in pregnancies of people with MS (15.2%) than in matched controls (9.8%), driven mainly by medically indicated procedures.

MS itself was documented as the reason for an early C-section in only two cases, suggesting provider labeling or referral practices rather than a direct disease effect.

People with MS were more likely to have a mental health condition at conception (27.5% vs. 2.8%) and less likely to have diabetes (6.5% vs. 16%) in this cohort.

# What the study looked at

# Main findings Early cesarean deliveries—those before 39 weeks of gestation—were more common among pregnancies in people with MS than in the matched control group (15.2% vs. 9.8%). The gap was mainly in medically indicated early C-sections: 11.5% of pregnancies in the MS group had medically indicated early C-sections versus 6.9% in controls. Nonmedically indicated early C-sections were low and similar between groups (3.7% vs. 2.8%).

MS itself was rarely listed as the reason for early C-section—documented in only two cases. The study also found that medical records often listed MS as a pregnancy complication or cited it as a reason for referral to high-risk pregnancy care.

# Outcomes and patient characteristics Newborn outcomes did not differ meaningfully between people with MS and controls who underwent early C-sections. Age, race/ethnicity, and parity were comparable between groups among those who had early C-sections. More than 73% of pregnancies in both groups involved at least one other health condition at conception.

Two notable differences in pre-pregnancy health were observed: a higher proportion of people with MS had a mental health condition at conception (27.5% vs. 2.8%), while diabetes was less common in the MS group (6.5% vs. 16%).

# What this means for patients and providers The data suggest that the higher rate of early C-sections in pregnancies among people with MS is tied to routine obstetric indications rather than to MS itself. The near-absence of MS listed as the direct cause of early C-section and the lack of an association between stalled labor and documented MS-related physical limitations point toward clinical reasons or referral patterns driving the difference.

The authors recommend comprehensive patient counseling and actions to address persistent provider misconceptions that may lead to labeling MS as a pregnancy complication or to precautionary referrals. They call for future research on how provider perceptions and counseling practices affect maternal mental health and for interventional studies to correct misperceptions about pregnancy risk in MS.

# Bottom line Early, medically indicated C-sections are more frequent in pregnancies of people with MS in this health-system cohort, but those surgeries largely reflect standard obstetric problems rather than direct effects of MS. Documentation practices and provider perceptions appear relevant to how pregnancy risk is communicated and managed in this population.

More context around this story.

When the Decision to Perform a C-Section Comes Too Late
Sommerspc iconSommerspcSep 17, 2026

When the Decision to Perform a C-Section Comes Too Late

Updated September 17, 2026 Many things can go wrong during labor and delivery. After months of slow growth and careful preparation, labor can be a whirlwind of chaos and confusion. Prenatal planning and proper medical care can help improve the chances of a safe birth, but unexpected complications can derail even the be

Anti-CD20 and natalizumab and pregnancy

Anti-CD20 and natalizumab and pregnancy

You can read the text Altamimi A, Almutairi BA, Shaybah ME, Almahmoud LE, Mazyad AA, Afash AS, Alharbi NAO, Ghibban NW, Alharbi RJM, Almohaimeed MY, Ghazwani AH, Alrashidi AE, Altamimi A. Maternal disease control and pregnancy outcomes with anti-CD20 therapy versus natalizumab in multiple sclerosis: a systematic review

Loading more related stories...

Keep reading in the app

Open the app view to save this story, compare related coverage, and continue from the same source.

Open in app