# Summary
Elizabeth Grace Matthew reviews Jill Filipovic's recent tribute to Gloria Steinem and offers a critical take on Steinem's legacy. She accepts Filipovic's central point that Steinem helped found second‑wave feminism and that this movement secured important legal and cultural gains for women. At the same time, Matthew argues that the movement's emphasis on individual choice—captureable in the phrase "do what she wants to do with her life"—has had negative consequences for women and for social cohesion.
# Background
Filipovic's essay, which Matthew calls one of the most incisive tributes, frames Steinem's life around a decisive early choice: at 23, Steinem ended a pregnancy and later devoted much of her life to securing legal access to abortion. Filipovic treats that moment as brave and transformative. Matthew accepts the factual outline but draws different judgments about its cultural meaning.
# Main arguments
Matthew separates two claims. First, she affirms the justice of women's legal equality and the value of recognizing women as full moral agents. Second, she argues that Steinem's particular iteration of feminism prioritized personal autonomy in a way that made family interdependence and traditional roles morally neutral or even suspect.
Matthew's core critique is ethical and cultural. She asks readers to consider how we judge similar behavior in men. If a man abandoned an engagement and a child to pursue personal ambitions, common labels would be selfish or irresponsible. Yet, she contends, comparable conduct by women has been recast as heroic within the cultural frame Steinem helped popularize. That double standard, she claims, lowers expectations for women's responsibility and reshapes popular norms about parenting, marriage, and community.
# Cultural examples
To illustrate cultural effects, Matthew discusses Disney films—especially The Little Mermaid. She describes Ariel's central desire to leave the sea for the human world as a shallow, escapist ambition that Disney frames as admirable. Matthew argues that Ariel and other princesses (Belle, Jasmine, Pocahontas) exemplify a template: a vague yearning to "live the life I want" becomes sufficient moral justification for abandoning existing obligations.
She contrasts that portrayal with male heroes in Disney narratives, where heroism is earned through sacrifice and concrete contribution. That contrast, she says, exposes a gendered difference in how cultural stories reward action versus escape.
# Assessment and implication
# Takeaway for readers