Insurancebusinessmag iconInsurancebusinessmagSep 18, 2026 ~6 min source read

As Dive In bows out, new technology reshapes insurance's talent challenge

After 12 years of Dive In, inclusion leaders at Aon and WTW say the festival’s final edition arrives as automated tools are changing recruitment, bias risks and career development in insurance.

As Dive In bows out, AI reshapes insurance's talent challenge

Share this story

Send the public story page.

Useful takeaways from this story.

Automation in recruitment can unintentionally exclude candidates if screening tools run without oversight and auditing.

Technology offers career-development supports such as real-time translation and skills mapping, but unequal access could create internal divides.

Conversations that once focused mainly on gender and the business case for diversity now include a wider set of issues: mental health, fertility, menopause, domestic abuse, disability and neurodiversity. Inclusion leaders say that discussing these topics openly at work has become more accepted, and that culture is now treated as a business priority rather than a side initiative.

Insurance still faces a visibility problem among younger workers. Many people enter insurance indirectly rather than choosing it early, and the sector can feel like a "secret" despite a wide range of careers. Firms have expanded graduate programmes and apprenticeships and are experimenting with earlier outreach, including programmes for 16- and 17-year-olds, to widen the pipeline.

Where technology matters in talent processes

Automated screening and other tools are being introduced to increase efficiency in recruitment and to support career development. Inclusion leaders warn that:

  • If firms allow automated screening to run without sufficient oversight, they risk excluding qualified candidates and narrowing the applicant pool. Monitoring who enters the recruitment funnel and who gets hired remains essential.
  • Talent decisions are ultimately human decisions. Transparency about how tools are used affects employee trust, and regular auditing of outputs and underlying data is necessary to detect bias.

Potential benefits for development—and new risks

Some firms are testing tools that can help employees prepare for difficult conversations, offer coaching, translate in real time and map skills to recommended training or mentoring. These functions can reduce barriers and make development pathways clearer. At the same time, unequal access to such tools could create a new internal divide between employees who can use them and those who cannot.

Practical implications for employers

Employers should treat automated systems as components of a process that still requires human governance. Specific practices mentioned by inclusion leaders include:

  • Tracking demographic flow through recruitment funnels rather than assuming neutrality of automated systems.
  • Conducting regular audits of model outputs and the historical data that informs them.
  • Maintaining transparency with employees about how tools are used in hiring and development.
  • Investing in equitable access to development tools so benefits reach a broad set of employees.

The final Dive In festival highlights unresolved questions about who benefits as these tools become embedded in everyday work. Will the technology widen access to careers and development, or will it concentrate advantages among those already well positioned to use the tools? The sector's response over the next few years will influence both talent pipelines and workplace inclusion outcomes.

More context around this story.

Loading more related stories...

Keep reading in the app

Open the app view to save this story, compare related coverage, and continue from the same source.

Open in app