Retired man deposits Rs 1.33cr, files no ITR; taxman sends notice, what ITAT said
This meant the department did not have details of the income he had earned during the period under scrutiny.
Useful takeaways from this story.
This meant the department did not have details of the income he had earned during the period under scrutiny.
Building the complete brief
The page is ready to read now. The fuller skim-friendly version will appear here automatically.
The useful part
This meant the department did not have details of the income he had earned during the period under scrutiny.
Keep reading in the app
Open the app view to save this story, compare related coverage, and continue from the same source.