Thehealthcareblog iconThehealthcareblogSep 21, 2026 ~4 min source read

Reader comment on 'Health in 2 Point 00, Episode 116' — a one-line response to a show about telehealth funding, layoffs, and Rock Health’s Q1 report

A reader named Ricardo left a brief comment — 'Thank You' — on a Health in 2 Point 00 episode post that summarized telehealth fundraising rounds, industry layoffs, and Rock Health’s Q1 fundraising report, plus an interview with Livongo’s Glen Tullman.

Share this story

Send the public story page.

Useful takeaways from this story.

Ricardo’s comment on the episode post contains a single, positive phrase: 'Thank You.'

The episode summarized multiple telehealth funding rounds and noted layoffs in the sector, and it included discussion of Rock Health’s Q1 fundraising report and an interview with Glen Tullman.

On the Health in 2 Point 00 episode 116 post, a reader using the name Ricardo posted the brief comment: "Thank You." The comment appears on a post that reviews a string of telehealth investment announcements, reports layoffs in the space, and offers commentary on Rock Health's Q1 fundraising report. The post also includes a tag-team interview with Glen Tullman of Livongo.

What the original episode post covers

The episode post (authored by Matthew Holt and Jessica DaMassa) lists recent telehealth funding news and gives perspective on fundraising trends. Specific rounds mentioned in the post include:

  • Doctor Anywhere: $27 million
  • 98point6: $43 million
  • Tyto Care: $50 million
  • SilverCloud Health: $16 million
  • SteadyMD: $6 million
  • Aktiia: $6 million
  • Air Doctor: $7.8 million (noted as a raise despite poor timing)

The hosts also note that the telehealth sector has experienced a number of layoffs. They offer their take on Rock Health's Q1 fundraising report and feature a guest interview with Glen Tullman of Livongo. The episode is available in podcast form on Spotify and iTunes.

Why a one-line comment matters here

Short comments like Ricardo's are common on blog posts and episode pages when readers want to acknowledge useful content without adding analysis. This specific comment does two practical things: it signals appreciation to the hosts and shows that at least one reader found the episode or post helpful enough to reply quickly. It doesn't add new information about the episode topics (funding, layoffs, Rock Health report, Livongo interview), but it does indicate audience engagement.

Ricardo's comment does not offer data, critique, or follow-up questions. It provides no details about which part of the episode was most helpful, no correction or disagreement, and no additional sources.

Practical takeaway for readers skimming comments

If you are scanning the comment thread to find additional insights beyond the episode post, Ricardo's comment is purely affirmative and does not expand on the content. For more context or debate, readers will need to look for longer comments or replies, or consult the episode itself for the hosts' views on the funding rounds, layoffs, and Rock Health's Q1 fundraising findings.

More context around this story.

Loading more related stories...

Keep reading in the app

Open the app view to save this story, compare related coverage, and continue from the same source.

Open in app