A Trump-appointed judge said the One Big Beautiful Bill Act did not convert the funding into "a lump-sum amount subject to EPA's discretion." Defendants acted contrary to Congress' intent and with "no other statutory authority" when they terminated it, she said.
A Trump-appointed judge said the One Big Beautiful Bill Act did not convert the funding into "a lump-sum amount subject to EPA's discretion." Defendants acted contrary to Congress' intent and with "no other...
The page is ready to read now. The fuller skim-friendly version will appear here automatically.
A Trump-appointed judge said the One Big Beautiful Bill Act did not convert the funding into "a lump-sum amount subject to EPA's discretion." Defendants acted contrary to Congress' intent and with "no other statutory authority" when they terminated it, she said.
A Trump-appointed judge said the One Big Beautiful Bill Act did not convert the funding into "a lump-sum amount subject to EPA's discretion." Defendants acted contrary to Congress' intent and with "no other statutory authority" when they terminated it, she said.
Open the app view to save this story, compare related coverage, and continue from the same source.