49thshelf icon49thshelfSep 21, 2026 ~7 min source read

Growing Together: How Relational Patterns Shape Movement Durability

An excerpt from For the Long Haul argues that sustained collective work requires deliberate, care-based relations. Two recurring relational patterns—paranoid suspicion and instrumentalizing people—undermine movement capacity and must be addressed if collective change is to persist.

Growing Together: Why Transformative Organizing Matters

Share this story

Send the public story page.

Useful takeaways from this story.

Two common relational patterns harm movements: a paranoid stance that prioritizes fault-finding and a tendency to treat people instrumentally as means to an end.

Paranoid reading closes off curiosity, vulnerability, and other modes of relating that sustain long-term collaboration.

Instrumental organizing reduces people to roles or resources, narrowing participation and undermining shared decision-making.

The useful part

Working together in sustained ways calls on us to be deliberate about how we relate with one another in movements and communities in struggle. Bringing care into how we relate with one another can be surprisingly difficult. There are two relational patterns, in particular, that pose persistent problems in movements.

How it works

  • In many forms of labor, student, community, and electoral organizing, leading organizers can come to view other people as bodies, followers, donors, or votes for them to accumulate and direct.
  • As Khan summarizes it, "here's our plan, you're a cog, and you just do this." In a parallel way, this pattern shows up in activist practices that treat relationship-building principally as a means to get...
  • Now, to be fair, people sometimes actively want to be treated instrumentally in political work.
  • They want to be assigned a discrete, predictable role and not have to participate in time-consuming planning and decision-making.
  • For the Long Haul addresses the question of how to sustain long-term involvement in transformative social movements.

What to take from it

The upshot of this is that there can't be any surprises at all when we're paranoid, because we close off our capacity to be curious, open, and vulnerable." This stance, they clarify, is warranted at times. The trouble comes when this relational pattern becomes a default. Smith and Montgomery suggest that "a paranoid stance tends towards constant vigilance, so that there can be no bad surprises.

Example or evidence

  • In fact, if we're committed to building long-haul movements, we have a responsibility to relate in more affirmative ways.
  • If we're committed to building long-haul movements, we have a responsibility to relate in more affirmative ways.
  • Likewise, building durable radical movements calls on us to relate in non-instrumental ways.
  • To win in significant ways, we will have to build and sustain movements—grassroots movements propelled by urgency, that move at a pace that we can maintain collectively, for years to come.

Details worth keeping

How to Stay in the Fight for a Better World (Between the Lines). The first is a tendency toward suspicion, rivalry, and dismissal. Whenever this topic comes up in discussions among activists, it quickly evokes head nods and horror stories about takedowns on social media, organizational territorialism, activist social status hierarchies, sectarian posturing, and radical self-righteousness.

Related coverage

  • Berkeley: Can we create spaces where everyone's voice matters? Equipped with patience, courage, and curiosity, students meet for the first time and discover what's possible when we listen to one another's perspectives.
  • Berkeley: Can we work together to build a better country if we don't share the same religious values? Graduate students show us how to use curiosity and patience to find a path forward.
  • 49thshelf: It's easy to feel helpless and hopeless in these increasingly complex and uncertain times.

More context around this story.

Cep iconCepSep 22, 2026

How One Collaborative’s Movement-Led Participatory Model Makes a Difference for GranteesKevin Bolduc Vice President, Assessment and Advisory Services, CEPEsperanza Pallana Executiv...

In the second half of 2025, CEP’s Assessment and Advisory Services Team worked with the teams at Philanthropy Together, Redstone, and Vital Impact to survey recent grant recipients of 21 […] The post How One Collaborative’s Movement-Led Participatory Model Makes a Difference for Grantees<div class="print-only-coauthors

Why We Write
49thshelf icon49thshelfSep 2, 2026

Why We Write

It's easy to feel helpless and hopeless in these increasingly complex and uncertain times. But thankfully, I read books. And I find that flipping through the pages of a story is one of the easiest, most beautiful and nourishing antidotes to despair. In an age when we are bombarded with AI-generated content and when the

Loading more related stories...

Keep reading in the app

Open the app view to save this story, compare related coverage, and continue from the same source.

Open in app