The useful part
Working together in sustained ways calls on us to be deliberate about how we relate with one another in movements and communities in struggle. Bringing care into how we relate with one another can be surprisingly difficult. There are two relational patterns, in particular, that pose persistent problems in movements.
How it works
- In many forms of labor, student, community, and electoral organizing, leading organizers can come to view other people as bodies, followers, donors, or votes for them to accumulate and direct.
- As Khan summarizes it, "here's our plan, you're a cog, and you just do this." In a parallel way, this pattern shows up in activist practices that treat relationship-building principally as a means to get...
- Now, to be fair, people sometimes actively want to be treated instrumentally in political work.
- They want to be assigned a discrete, predictable role and not have to participate in time-consuming planning and decision-making.
- For the Long Haul addresses the question of how to sustain long-term involvement in transformative social movements.
What to take from it
The upshot of this is that there can't be any surprises at all when we're paranoid, because we close off our capacity to be curious, open, and vulnerable." This stance, they clarify, is warranted at times. The trouble comes when this relational pattern becomes a default. Smith and Montgomery suggest that "a paranoid stance tends towards constant vigilance, so that there can be no bad surprises.
Example or evidence
- In fact, if we're committed to building long-haul movements, we have a responsibility to relate in more affirmative ways.
- If we're committed to building long-haul movements, we have a responsibility to relate in more affirmative ways.
- Likewise, building durable radical movements calls on us to relate in non-instrumental ways.
- To win in significant ways, we will have to build and sustain movements—grassroots movements propelled by urgency, that move at a pace that we can maintain collectively, for years to come.
Details worth keeping
How to Stay in the Fight for a Better World (Between the Lines). The first is a tendency toward suspicion, rivalry, and dismissal. Whenever this topic comes up in discussions among activists, it quickly evokes head nods and horror stories about takedowns on social media, organizational territorialism, activist social status hierarchies, sectarian posturing, and radical self-righteousness.
Related coverage
- Berkeley: Can we create spaces where everyone's voice matters? Equipped with patience, courage, and curiosity, students meet for the first time and discover what's possible when we listen to one another's perspectives.
- Berkeley: Can we work together to build a better country if we don't share the same religious values? Graduate students show us how to use curiosity and patience to find a path forward.
- 49thshelf: It's easy to feel helpless and hopeless in these increasingly complex and uncertain times.