Let's continue our critical look at William Lane Craig's treatment of Thomism and the doctrine of divine simplicity in Volume IIa of his Systematic Philosophical Theology. In the first part of this series, I showed that in several ways, Craig badly misunderstands the views of Aquinas and other Thomists.
Let's continue our critical look at William Lane Craig's treatment of Thomism and the doctrine of divine simplicity in Volume IIa of his Systematic Philosophical Theology.
In the first part of this series, I showed that in several ways, Craig badly misunderstands the views of Aquinas and other Thomists.
In this second part, I'll turn to Craig's treatment of the more general metaphysical disputes underlying the debate over divine simplicity, and to specific criticisms he raises against the doctrine and the...
The page is ready to read now. The fuller skim-friendly version will appear here automatically.
Let's continue our critical look at William Lane Craig's treatment of Thomism and the doctrine of divine simplicity in Volume IIa of his Systematic Philosophical Theology. In the first part of this series, I showed that in several ways, Craig badly misunderstands the views of Aquinas and other Thomists. In this second part, I'll turn to Craig's treatment of the more general metaphysical disputes underlying the debate over divine simplicity, and to specific criticisms he raises against the doctrine and the arguments of its defenders.
In this second part, I'll turn to Craig's treatment of the more general metaphysical disputes underlying the debate over divine simplicity, and to specific criticisms he raises against the doctrine and the arguments of its defenders.
Open the app view to save this story, compare related coverage, and continue from the same source.
