Ipwatchdog iconIpwatchdogSep 23, 2026

Latest Centripetal SCOTUS Petition Challenges Material Changes in Claim Construction Post-Markman

Virginia-based secure network developer Centripetal Networks has filed a petition for writ of certiorari asking the U.S. Supreme Court for the second time to weigh in on issues related to its patent infringement claims against Cisco Networks' unauthorized copying of its packet filtering and hacker prevention technologies.

Latest Centripetal SCOTUS Petition Challenges Material Changes in Claim Construction Post-Markman

Share this story

Send the public story page.

Useful takeaways from this story.

Virginia-based secure network developer Centripetal Networks has filed a petition for writ of certiorari asking the U.S.

Supreme Court for the second time to weigh in on issues related to its patent infringement claims against Cisco Networks' unauthorized copying of its packet filtering and hacker prevention technologies.

In this petition, Centripetal asks the nation's highest court whether the Federal Circuit erred in affirming a materially different claim construction entered by the district court without giving...

Building the complete brief

The page is ready to read now. The fuller skim-friendly version will appear here automatically.

The useful part

Virginia-based secure network developer Centripetal Networks has filed a petition for writ of certiorari asking the U.S. Supreme Court for the second time to weigh in on issues related to its patent infringement claims against Cisco Networks' unauthorized copying of its packet filtering and hacker prevention technologies. In this petition, Centripetal asks the nation's highest court whether the Federal Circuit erred in affirming a materially different claim construction entered by the district court without giving Centripetal a meaningful opportunity to adjust its infringement position based on the new claim scope.

Details worth keeping

In this petition, Centripetal asks the nation's highest court whether the Federal Circuit erred in affirming a materially different claim construction entered by the district court without giving Centripetal a meaningful opportunity to adjust its infringement position based on the new claim scope.

Keep reading in the app

Open the app view to save this story, compare related coverage, and continue from the same source.

Open in app