# Zen The author revisits a concept introduced in March: karma, understood not as instant payoff but as the product of intentional, virtuous actions and a contented commitment to a process. In fantasy baseball this translates into valuing players whose preparation, adjustments, and approach indicate sustainable improvement rather than treating results as purely luck-driven.
# How the author defines karma for baseball Karma is presented as action and intent more than immediate consequence. Good intentions and wise methods tend to produce positive outcomes over time, but results can be delayed, inconsistent, or influenced by luck. The useful managerial takeaway is to judge players on the quality of their process — training, health maintenance, adjustments — as much as on raw outcomes.
# Drew Rasmussen: an example of process-driven improvement Rasmussen is the season's lead example. The supplied numbers: 172 innings, 2.67 ERA, 0.91 WHIP, 16 wins, 174 strikeouts, 26% K rate, and a 4.8% walk rate (32 walks). On the Razzball Player Rater he ranks 11th with a $31.50 value. Those results contrast sharply with where he was drafted this season (outside the top 10 rounds), implying significant fantasy profit.
What changed and why the author views it as intentional
- Health: Rasmussen remained healthy all season after prior injury issues. The author attributes at least part of his availability to improved fitness routines and care for his body. While acknowledging some health is luck, the article leans toward crediting intentional preparation.
How to use this as a fantasy manager
- Draft positioning: Rasmussen's profile suggests he should be drafted substantially higher next season than he was this year, given the combination of durability and improved peripherals.
- Process over single metrics: When a pitcher's improved results coincide with measurable process changes (health, location, contact quality), treat the season as repeatable until contradicted by new data.
# The article's broader point The author intends to celebrate multiple players who look to be on that "karmic path" — those who act and prepare wisely and are now reaping clearer results. The writer expects both highlighted players to be drafted higher next year, and for the unnamed hitter, suggests the possibility of top overall consideration.
# Practical takeaway Evaluate players by the quality of their preparation and measurable adjustments. When strong results align with tangible, explainable process changes, treat those performances as more dependable in future drafts and roster decisions.