Huffpost iconHuffpostSep 24, 2026 ~2 min source read

Columnist Proposes Women-Only White House Press Corps to Counter Trump’s Attacks on Kaitlan Collins

Ana Marie Cox argues in a Mediaite column that replacing or disbanding the current White House press corps could blunt President Trump’s sexist attacks on CNN’s Kaitlan Collins and free journalists to report without constant personal harassment.

Columnist Pens Revolutionary Idea To Stop Trump's Attacks On Kaitlan Collins

Share this story

Send the public story page.

Useful takeaways from this story.

Ana Marie Cox proposed an all-women White House press corps to deprive President Trump of a sympathetic, largely male audience and to blunt his pattern of targeting female reporters.

The proposal drew significant attention online, and it arrived amid legal and public pushback against the administration’s bans on certain outlets such as CNN, MS NOW and Politico.

What the proposal is

Ana Marie Cox, founder of Wonkette and a contributing editor at The New Republic, wrote a Mediaite column suggesting two alternative responses to President Trump's repeated attacks on female reporters. One: staff the White House press corps exclusively with women. Two: disband the press corps entirely so accomplished reporters can spend less time responding to personal abuse and more time reporting.

Cox framed the women-only option as a strategic, collective move rather than a symbolic stunt. She argued that sending only women would remove what Trump perceives as a sympathetic, mostly male audience and would "frighten him," because bullies need the sense they can win. She added that an all-women corps would also send a public message: there are more than enough women qualified to hold what's often called the most prestigious job in journalism.

Collins

The legal and public backdrop

Cox's column also argued that the ban and the broader focus on access have made the press corps overly dependent on proximity to the president. She called the ban an "unexpected gift" for encouraging reporters to prioritize reporting over access, and she used that line of thought to support disbanding the traditional press corps as an option.

How people reacted

Cox's idea generated substantial online attention, visible in multiplying comments on Mediaite's site. The piece circulated widely in news coverage and social commentary, with other outlets covering both the president's confrontations with Collins and the larger question of access and press freedom.

Practical implications to consider

  • The idea operates within an ongoing clash over media access and presidential conduct: courts and newsrooms are already contesting bans and the broader pattern of targeting particular outlets.

Bottom line

Cox's column is a provocative prescription aimed at changing the day-to-day interaction between the White House and journalists by altering who speaks for the press or eliminating that single forum. She presented it as a tactical choice to protect and empower women reporters like Kaitlan Collins and to shift public understanding of who can perform the highest-profile reporting duties.

More context around this story.

When this Maga ambassador tried to defend Trump’s media ban, CNN’s Kaitlin Collins unleashed the perfect comeback to stun him into silence
Thepoke iconThepokeSep 22, 2026

When this Maga ambassador tried to defend Trump’s media ban, CNN’s Kaitlin Collins unleashed the perfect comeback to stun him into silence

Donald Trump does not want pesky reporters around anymore. He’s openly calling for a ban on unfriendly media and the more his administration talks about it, the worse it looks. The latest Trump ring kisser to defend the President’s fascist approach to the press is US Ambassador to the United Nations, Mike Waltz. If tha

Loading more related stories...

Keep reading in the app

Open the app view to save this story, compare related coverage, and continue from the same source.

Open in app