A short, high-profile dispute over White House press access ended Friday when a federal judge ordered that three news organisations be readmitted to the White House grounds. The court action prompted major U.S. television networks to resume pooled coverage of presidential events after a dayslong halt.
President Trump had suspended access for CNN, MS NOW (formerly MSNBC) and Politico on September 18, saying he was unhappy with their reporting. Those outlets sued, arguing the removal lacked proper process.
U.S. District Judge Timothy Kelly, who was appointed by Trump, issued a ruling that the outlets were likely to show their passes had been withdrawn without proper due process and rejected the administration's national security rationale. The judge ordered immediate readmission of the reporters and issued a temporary restraining order that will last two weeks as the case moves forward.
Earlier in the week ABC, CBS, Fox News and NBC—alongside CNN—refused to supply the video pool for White House events in solidarity with the barred outlets. That refusal meant there was no steady, high-quality pooled footage available for some of the president's public appearances this week.
The immediate effect was the restoration of standard, shared live feeds that networks supply to one another under the long-standing pool arrangement. For viewers and other media outlets that rely on the pool, that means access to the president's appearances and visits that had been unavailable earlier in the week.
The judge's order is temporary. The underlying case will proceed, and the restraining order provides restored access while the court considers the merits. The administration did not immediately comment in the published reports.
Because the primary television pool had paused, certain high-profile events lacked extensive live network coverage. Reports noted that no major network carried live coverage of Thursday's state dinner for Xi Jinping, and networks said CNN and MS NOW journalists had been denied access to his arrival. The pause in pooled coverage interrupted a long-standing cooperative system whereby the largest networks split costs and rotate responsibility for providing footage.
Expect the legal challenge to determine whether the administration's actions met constitutional and procedural requirements. Networks now resume their rotating pool duties, but the temporary nature of the court order means access could again be contested depending on the court's next steps.
Court action restored press passes for three outlets and cleared the way for the major networks to resume pooled coverage. The dispute highlighted the reliance of U.S. media on pooled arrangements for consistent live coverage of presidential events, and the legal fight will continue while the temporary order remains in force.