# What the research says Atlassian's summary pulls together several peer-reviewed findings and surveys to make a simple case: teams produce better outcomes than individuals when they operate with clear communication, psychological safety, and diversity of perspective.
Short, specific results cited in the piece:
- Groups of three to five outperform the best individuals on many problem-solving tasks (Patrick Laughlin, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign).
- A survey of more than 1,000 team members found that teams encouraging honest feedback, mutual respect, and personal openness make members 80% more likely to report higher emotional well-being.
- Clear communication can reduce turnover risk by nearly 50% (summary note cited in a comment attached to the Atlassian post).
# Why these findings matter for managers and team leads If you manage or lead a team, these are the actionable implications:
- Design for small, deliberative group sizes when you need high-quality problem solving. Groups of three to five are a practical starting point.
- Build explicit norms for honest feedback and mutual respect. The survey data ties those behaviors to much higher reported well-being among team members.
- Prioritize diverse composition on projects where creativity or new solutions matter. Diversity changes how people approach problems and can increase idea generation.
- Protect psychological safety so people take calculated risks. Teams that feel supported are more likely to innovate.
- Treat communication as a retention tool. Better communication is linked to a large reduction in turnover risk.
# Practical steps to try this week
- Run a 15-minute retrospective focused solely on feedback norms: what's working, what's missing, one change to test.
- When forming problem-solving groups, aim for three to five people with complementary skills rather than adding everyone to the meeting.
- Use asynchronous channels for initial idea generation so people who need thinking time can contribute fully.
- Track simple happiness signals (pulse check surveys or one-question weekly check-ins) and connect them to productivity measures you already collect.
# What to expect when you get this right Teams that adopt these practices should see clearer decision-making, more novelty in solutions, better individual wellbeing, and lower voluntary turnover over time. The sources referenced connect these outcomes to concrete mechanisms—communication patterns, group size, and team composition—so fixes are operational rather than abstract.
# Closing takeaway Teamwork delivers measurable advantages in problem solving, innovation, well-being, and retention, but only when structures and norms support honest communication, psychological safety, and diverse perspectives. Focus on group design, feedback norms, and communication practices to convert potential into results.