# The problem in practice
Canada's national dementia strategies encourage helping people live at home for as long as possible. For many families that means unpaid labour: relatives piece together services, research options, contact multiple providers and make repeated, consequential choices as the person's condition changes.
A composite example in the reporting shows a daughter, Lisa, gradually assuming responsibility for her mother Margaret. There was no single takeover moment. Instead, Lisa made a series of decisions—about home supports, medications, trackers, appointments and safety—while cutting back on work and taking unpaid leave. By the time her mother entered long‑term care both were exhausted and felt the move happened earlier than preferred. The decision was shaped less by clinical needs than by gaps in coordinated supports.
# Why co‑ordination matters for dementia
Care co‑ordination means organizing services across providers so the person gets the right help at the right time without duplication or gaps. For families practical features of co‑ordinated care are:
- One consistent point of contact
- A shared care plan
- Communication among providers
- Proactive navigation as needs change
- Connections across healthcare, home care, housing and community services
When those elements are missing, families are left to act as the connecting tissue between clinics, home‑care agencies and community programs.
- Eleven federally funded initiatives focused mainly on education and information scored an average of 36%.
- Four provincially funded programs explicitly designed to co‑ordinate care scored 81% on average.
The gap shows that a collection of useful programs does not automatically produce a system that responds to changing needs. Measuring co‑ordination gives funders and policymakers a concrete way to decide which programs better reduce the burden on families.
# What a system that works would look like
The reporting uses an air‑traffic metaphor: families are acting like air‑traffic controllers for individual care journeys because the system lacks a mechanism that assigns responsibility, shares up‑to‑date information and follows a coordinated plan.
Practically, a more functional system would assign clear responsibility for care navigation, provide a single contact or team to manage transitions, support multidisciplinary collaboration, and fund ongoing followup. Those elements reduce duplication, clarify roles and help families plan ahead rather than react.
# Concrete implications for families and policymakers
For families: expect to encounter fragmented services and multiple decision points. Ask early about whether a program offers a named navigator, multidisciplinary team support, shared care plans and formal followup.
For policymakers and funders: use measurement tools like the Care Coordination Assessment Matrix to prioritize programs that deliver navigation, provider connections and continuous followup rather than standalone education campaigns.
A system that reduces the coordination load on families will help people with dementia remain at home when that aligns with their wishes, and reduce the personal and financial toll on caregivers.