Police1 iconPolice1Sep 25, 2026 ~4 min source read

After-action report finds multiple security failures at Utah Valley University before Charlie Kirk’s killing

An external review says Turning Point USA insisted on an outdoor venue, the university skipped formal threat assessments and event planning steps, and coordination with security partners was incomplete.

Report finds security deficiencies at Utah university where Charlie Kirk was killed

Share this story

Send the public story page.

Useful takeaways from this story.

Turning Point USA pressed to hold the Sept. 10, 2025, event outdoors despite university concerns about the courtyard’s surrounding tall buildings.

Utah Valley University did not perform a formal security assessment, did not produce a written event action plan, and deferred key decisions to the event organizer.

The planning process lacked documented line-of-sight analysis, pre-event briefings or walk-throughs, clear coordination with the speaker’s private security team, and coordination with external law enforcement.

# What the report found

An external after-action review released by Utah Valley University examined planning and security for Turning Point USA's Sept. 10, 2025, appearance where Charlie Kirk was killed by a rooftop sniper. The report identifies a chain of planning choices and procedural gaps that created vulnerabilities.

# Decisions about venue

Turning Point USA representatives insisted Kirk speak in an outdoor courtyard on campus because the organization was familiar with that location. University staff raised reservations about holding the event outdoors given surrounding tall buildings, but the event proceeded at the organizer's preferred site. The report states those venue decisions were consequential because the courtyard created "significant protective operations considerations." Kirk spoke outdoors to several thousand attendees.

# Missing assessments and plans

The university did not conduct a formal security assessment and did not create a written event action plan. Investigators found no documented line-of-sight assessment that would have considered elevated vantage points such as rooftops more than 400 feet away. There was also no documented pre-event briefing or coordinated walk-through that included all security stakeholders.

# Coordination gaps

# The shooting and legal status

# What the report ties to the outcome

The report links several of the identified planning deficiencies to the protective challenges posed by the outdoor courtyard and surrounding structures. Specifically, it points to the lack of threat assessment and the absence of written operational planning as failures that contributed to an incomplete protective posture for the event.

# How the event compared with common practices

An Associated Press review cited in the report notes the campus did not use several practices that have become common at large public events: appropriate staffing levels, drone-based rooftop monitoring, local law enforcement coordination, and bag checks or metal detectors.

# Practical implications for campus event security

The findings highlight modest procedural actions—formal threat assessments, written event action plans, line-of-sight checks, coordinated briefings, and clearer division of planning authority—that change how risk is documented and mitigated. The report also surfaces resource and operational gaps (staffing and monitoring capabilities) that affect the level of protection a campus can deliver when large, high-profile events occur.

# Next steps noted in reporting

The university released the external review publicly. Kirk's family has sent a wrongful-death notice to state officials foreshadowing legal action that challenges the university's decisions. The criminal case against the accused shooter continues toward trial.

More context around this story.

Loading more related stories...

Keep reading in the app

Open the app view to save this story, compare related coverage, and continue from the same source.

Open in app