Independent iconIndependentSep 27, 2026 ~5 min source read

Don’t let Russian aggression distract us from backing Ukraine to the hilt

An Independent editorial argues European allies must maintain strong political, financial and military support for Kyiv despite a campaign of Russian harassment and threats aimed at weakening Western resolve.

Don’t let Russian aggression distract us from backing Ukraine to the hilt

Share this story

Send the public story page.

Useful takeaways from this story.

Russia is conducting a campaign of hybrid warfare—sabotage, cyberattacks, false-flag strikes and air intimidation—designed to erode European support for Ukraine.

Nordic cooperation demonstrated effective air‑defence readiness when Swedish and Finnish jets intercepted Russian aircraft in international airspace.

There is a low but growing risk of limited Russian attacks on NATO border states to probe allies’ willingness to respond, with Lithuania frequently mentioned in speculation.

Swedish and Finnish fighter jets were scrambled to intercept Russian air force planes travelling through the Gulf of Finland. The aircraft were in international airspace, but the joint Nordic response showed how Finland and Sweden can defend their territory and NATO's northern flank now that they are alliance members.

The editorial frames recent Russian actions as a coordinated hybrid warfare campaign. Examples listed include attempted drone strikes, sabotage, cyberattacks, covert surveillance of undersea cables, politically motivated interference, and aggressive overflights that buzz NATO aircraft. These tactics aim to intimidate European publics and leaders, raise the political cost of supporting Ukraine, and push Western capitals toward retrenchment.

Senior European figures—identified in the piece as the presidents and premiers of several NATO states and the UK's chief of defence staff—have publicly warned about escalating Russian tactics. The head of Denmark's intelligence service warned of a "low but growing risk" that Russia might carry out limited military strikes on NATO border states, possibly using long‑range weapons or false‑flag attacks that could sow confusion and fear.

Possible scenarios and plausibility

The editorial notes speculation around a potential Russian move against Lithuania, which borders the Russian exclave of Kaliningrad. Such an attack could isolate the Baltic states and test NATO's willingness to respond. The piece judges a full‑scale invasion of the Baltics unlikely, arguing the Kremlin appears more interested in sustained pressure designed to undermine support for Ukraine than in risking a direct conventional confrontation that could trigger wider war.

Impact on European politics and defence

European governments face political and fiscal constraints that inhibit rapid rearmament. Defence spending increases and industrial shifts toward armaments are described as slow across much of the continent. The editorial singles out Poland as an exception that has moved more decisively to remilitarise. It also points to rising domestic opposition in some countries to continued support for Ukraine, citing parties and leaders who are either skeptical or openly hostile to further aid.

The piece references US diplomacy, noting that the US will allow Ukraine to manufacture Patriot missile systems according to President Zelensky. It also mentions unsuccessful efforts—if attempted—to persuade China to stop supporting Russia's war machine, suggesting Beijing continues to be a complicating factor for Western strategy.

More context around this story.

Loading more related stories...

Keep reading in the app

Open the app view to save this story, compare related coverage, and continue from the same source.

Open in app