Wislawjournal iconWislawjournalSep 28, 2026 ~6 min source read

Court of Appeals: Permission Defeats Claim for Prescriptive Easement in Cabak v. Winchell

The Wisconsin Court of Appeals affirmed a circuit court ruling that a neighbor’s use of a private road was permissive, not hostile, so it did not meet the 20-year prescriptive-easement requirement.

Share this story

Send the public story page.

Useful takeaways from this story.

Prescriptive easement requires adverse, hostile use that is open, notorious, under a claim of right, and continuous for 20 years.

A presumption of adverse use can be rebutted by proof that landowner permission existed.

Credibility determinations about permission and use are factual findings for the trial court and are reversed only if clearly erroneous.

The useful part

Property law — Prescriptive Easement Requirements Cabak, who owned an adjoining 42-acre parcel to Winchell, claimed he had continuously used the road for more than 20 years to access his property. To establish a prescriptive easement, Cabak had to prove adverse, hostile use that was open, notorious, under a claim of right, and continuous for 20 years. Although the parties agreed that a presumption of adverse use applied, that presumption could be rebutted by evidence that the use was permissive.

How it works

  • Marketing Marketing The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • How data breach response planning is different for law firms Operator of AI music generator can't escape copyright suit New AI tool for legal document workflows announced See All Legal Tech News Legal Tech...
  • Joel Winchell testified that he gave Cabak permission to walk the road to his property and park near the gate, and other family members corroborated aspects of that testimony.
  • The circuit court credited the Winchell's' testimony over Cabak's conflicting account.
  • Appeals found that the circuit court's factual findings were not clearly erroneous.

What to take from it

the court noted that evidence concerning Cabak's use of the road by farmers and loggers did not establish hostile use because the Winchells had permitted such access. Because the Winchell's' permission defeated the hostile-use requirement, Cabak failed to establish a prescriptive easement. Statistics Statistics The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.

Example or evidence

  • The court also rejected Cabak's arguments concerning inconsistencies between the Winchell's' deposition and trial testimony, explaining that credibility determinations belonged to the circuit court.
  • Related Content Professional Misconduct-Aggravating Factors The Wisconsin Supreme Court suspended Attorney Patrick J.
  • Tamazia Wed Jul 15, 2026 TEAL IP Wed Jun 24, 2026 FTO Checker Mon Jun 22, 2026 Concord Wed Jul 15, 2026 Descrybe Wed Jun 3, 2026 MORE CASES...
  • Through these technologies, we and certain third parties may automatically collect information about your interactions with our website, such as your browsing behavior and page views.

Details worth keeping

Property law — Prescriptive Easement Requirements. We also may share this information about your activity on our website with our social media, advertising, analytics, and other business partners.

Related coverage

  • Indiatimes: Long-term occupation of a property does not automatically amount to adverse possession. To establish such a claim, there must also be a clear assertion of hostile title along with the necessary animus.
  • Legalbites: Supreme Court clarifies the law on adverse possession, holding that prolonged occupation alone cannot confer title without clear hostile intent.
  • Wislawjournal: Watters challenged the circuit court's refusal to grant him an easement over a logging road and its denial of his request for equitable contribution toward constructing alternative access.
  • Natlawreview: Vague language in easements is one of the most common sources of property disputes.
  • Wislawjournal: A Milwaukee County judge ruled Wisconsin's Public Trust Doctrine protects walking along Lake Michigan below the ordinary high-water mark.

More context around this story.

Wislawjournal iconWislawjournalSep 21, 2026

Easement Rights-Judicial Estoppel

Watters challenged the circuit court’s refusal to grant him an easement over a logging road and its denial of his request for equitable contribution toward constructing alternative access. He also alleged judicial bias. The post Easement Rights-Judicial Estoppel appeared first on Wisconsin Law Journal - WI Legal News &

The Dangers of Vague Language in Easements
Natlawreview iconNatlawreviewSep 23, 2026

The Dangers of Vague Language in Easements

Vague language in easements is one of the most common sources of property disputes. When the wording is unclear, owners, neighbors, and even tenants can find themselves fighting over basic questions and creating enforcement issues over time. What is an easement? An easement is a legal right to use someone else’s land f

Wislawjournal iconWislawjournalSep 14, 2026

Equity/Civil Procedure-Equal Ownership Rights

The dispute arose among three siblings, Susan Baird, Cynthia Merritt, and John Merritt, over disagreements regarding a co-equally owned family cabin’s use, maintenance, and John’s assertion that his status as a Wausaukee Club member gave him superior control. The post Equity/Civil Procedure-Equal Ownership Rights appea

Loading more related stories...

Keep reading in the app

Open the app view to save this story, compare related coverage, and continue from the same source.

Open in app