Justsecurity iconJustsecuritySep 28, 2026 ~4 min source read

Guantanamo Dispatch: Even If Acquitted, Accused USS Cole Bomber Could Remain Detained

Defense lawyers told a military judge they want jurors told that Abd al-Rahim al-Nashiri could be held indefinitely under the law of war even if they find him not guilty in the military commission trial for the 2000 USS Cole bombing.

Guantanamo Dispatch: Innocent or Guilty, Accused USS Cole Bomber May Never Go Free

Share this story

Send the public story page.

Useful takeaways from this story.

Defense asks judge to inform jury that an acquittal would not automatically lead to release because al-Nashiri is separately held as a law-of-war detainee under the 2001 AUMF.

Al-Nashiri has been in U.S. custody since 2002 after CIA black-site detention and alleged torture, and was indicted at Guantanamo in 2011.

Jury selection for the first-ever Guantanamo death-penalty trial is expected in October, with the main trial proceedings scheduled at Guantanamo in 2027.

# Summary

Defense lawyers in the military commission case against Abd al-Rahim al-Nashiri want the judge to tell the jury upfront that a not-guilty verdict would not automatically free him. Al-Nashiri is charged in the October 2000 suicide bombing of the USS Cole that killed 17 U.S. sailors. The government has held him since 2002 as an al-Qaeda affiliate under the 2001 Authorization for Use of Military Force (AUMF), treating him as a law-of-war detainee who can be detained for the duration of "continuing hostilities."

# What the defense asked for

# Background on al-Nashiri's detention

# How this affects the jury and trial

The defense wants jurors to have a clear explanation of the separate legal tracks: the military commissions prosecution seeking convictions and a death sentence, and the law-of-war detention status that can persist regardless of the verdict. Jury selection is scheduled to begin in October, and the main trial activity is expected at Guantanamo in 2027. The unusual overlap of criminal prosecution and indefinite detention raises procedural and fairness questions the defense says jurors should know about.

# Why this matters

The case is both legally and politically sensitive. It involves the first death-penalty trial at Guantanamo, the long-term use of the AUMF to justify detention, and a defendant who was previously held in CIA black sites. The defense is arguing that jurors must understand how the government's separate detention authority could leave al-Nashiri confined even if they decline to convict him.

# Related procedural notes

Recent pretrial activity in the case includes filings about remote testimony and a last-minute sanity board ordered by the military judge. Prosecutors have indicated many witnesses will appear by video because the event occurred more than two decades ago and many prospective witnesses are no longer in active government service.

# Bottom line

The defense seeks an explicit jury instruction about law-of-war detention so jurors understand that a not-guilty verdict would not guarantee release. The broader legal question is how criminal process and wartime detention authorities interact in a long-running case tied to the post-9/11 security framework.

More context around this story.

Loading more related stories...

Keep reading in the app

Open the app view to save this story, compare related coverage, and continue from the same source.

Open in app