Law360 iconLaw360Sep 28, 2026 ~5 min source read

Delaware Judge Dismisses Patent Claims by ModoPayments Against Volvo Division, Keeps Copyright Counts

A federal judge in Delaware cut ModoPayments' patent-infringement claims over a digital payment hub patent against a division of Volvo but allowed the lawsuit's copyright infringement allegations to continue.

Judge Cuts Patent Claims Against Volvo Over Payment Data

Share this story

Send the public story page.

Useful takeaways from this story.

A Delaware federal judge dismissed ModoPayments' patent-infringement claims against a division of Volvo tied to a digital payment hub patent (U.S. Patent No. 11,216,805).

The court preserved the lawsuit's copyright infringement claims, so litigation will proceed on those issues.

The dispute involves ModoPayments, which owned the payment-hub patent, and a Volvo entity identified in filings as a division of AB Volvo.

# What happened A Delaware federal judge dismissed patent-infringement claims that ModoPayments had brought against a division of Volvo related to a digital payments hub. The court did not dismiss the copyright claims in the same case, so those allegations remain alive and will proceed through the litigation process.

# Parties and intellectual property at issue ModoPayments is the plaintiff. The company asserted a patent described in court filings as U.S. Patent No. 11,216,805, identified with the caption "COIN operated digital payments hub." The defendant is a division of AB Volvo, named in filings as a Volvo entity.

# Court action and immediate effect

# Why this matters Patent claims and copyright claims follow different legal doctrines, proof requirements, and potential remedies. Losing patent claims reduces the plaintiff's leverage on technology- or design-focused theories and may affect damages theories tied to patented functionality. Keeping copyright claims preserves allegations of unauthorized copying or use of creative works, which can produce different remedies and discovery focuses.

# Practical implications for the parties

  • For ModoPayments: The plaintiff must proceed without its patent claims and concentrate resources on proving the remaining copyright allegations. Strategies may include tightening fact and expert discovery on source materials, copying, and statutory damages or injunctive relief under copyright law.
  • For the Volvo division: The defendant gains a narrower scope of exposure without patent claims but still faces copyright litigation. Its defense can focus on noninfringement, fair use, licensing defenses, or challenges to the copyright assertions.

# Procedural next steps likely to follow With the patent claims dismissed, the parties will proceed on the remaining claims. That generally means scheduling further case-management deadlines, discovery on the copyright issues, and possibly motions focused on copyright law questions. Settlement discussions remain an option at any stage but will center on the copyright claims that the court left standing.

# What was explicit in filings Court papers and the reporting identify the patent at issue as U.S. Patent No. 11,216,805, described as a COIN-operated digital payments hub. The decision came in the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware and involves ModoPayments as plaintiff and a division of AB Volvo as defendant.

# Bottom line The judge narrowed the case by removing the patent-infringement claims while allowing copyright claims to proceed. The litigation will continue, but the legal theories and potential remedies now focus on copyright rather than patent law.

More context around this story.

Judge Trims Claims In Insurance Software Trade Secret Case
Law360 iconLaw360Aug 31, 2026

Judge Trims Claims In Insurance Software Trade Secret Case

A federal judge in Chicago on Monday issued a mixed ruling in a case brought by a company that makes insurance agency management software against a rival that it claims created a fake insurance company to steal trade secrets, dismissing some claims but preserving others for trade secret misappropriation and violations

Fed. Circ. OKs PTAB Axing Some SpaceTime3D Claims
Law360 iconLaw360Aug 31, 2026

Fed. Circ. OKs PTAB Axing Some SpaceTime3D Claims

The Federal Circuit on Monday affirmed a pair of rulings from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board that found two patents and some claims in a third patent covering graphical user interface technology held by SpaceTime3D Inc. were unpatentable, siding with challenges made by Apple and Google.

Loading more related stories...

Keep reading in the app

Open the app view to save this story, compare related coverage, and continue from the same source.

Open in app