Trendingineducation iconTrendingineducationSep 29, 2026 ~3 min source read

Centering the Rising Generation: Dr. Janice Jackson on Screens, AI, and the Future of Schooling

Dr. Janice Jackson argues for youth-centered policy on technology in schools: ban phones in classrooms, require evidence for edtech, teach digital literacy, and use AI to narrow opportunity gaps rather than widen them.

Centering the Rising Generation: Dr. Janice Jackson on Screens, AI, and the Future of Schooling

Share this story

Send the public story page.

Useful takeaways from this story.

Put young people at the center of conversations about schooling—Aspen’s Rising Generations Strategy Group begins with student provocations and joint AI risk-opportunity exercises.

State policy and trust in institutions matter: Illinois’ new AI legislation and resources like the Edelman Trust Barometer, Bellwether’s framework, Digital Promise, and ISTE provide entry points for guardrails.

# What this conversation is about

# Phones, edtech, and equity

# Youth-centered policy design

Aspen's Rising Generations Strategy Group is cross-sector, cross-partisan, and intergenerational. Jackson emphasizes starting with young people. At Aspen's first convening, students opened the conversation with four provocations and took part in an "AI Futures" exercise that weighed risks and opportunities together. That kind of participatory design puts students beyond passive input—into shaping the questions and priorities.

# From hype to accountability

Jackson calls for the edtech industry to prove efficacy. Technology that augments learning should be held accountable: show measurable learning outcomes, explain how tools narrow rather than widen gaps, and make help-seeking transparent and ethical. She recommends digital literacy over prohibition so students learn how to use tools responsibly and effectively.

# Policy levers and trust

Hope Chicago's practical lesson: normalizing help-seeking changes outcomes. When the aim is to level the playing field, technology that provides tutoring, feedback, or scaffolded practice can be an equalizer. The question for schools and districts is not whether technology should exist, but how to ensure it supports authentic learning and access.

# Practical implications for educators and policymakers

  • Evaluate edtech on demonstrated learning impact and equity effects before wide adoption.
  • Teach digital literacy and help-seeking norms so students use tools productively.
  • Engage students in policy design and scenario exercises (e.g., AI futures) to surface risks and opportunities.
  • Use state policy and sectoral frameworks to set guardrails and maintain public trust.

# Where this conversation connects to other resources

The episode references frameworks and organizations practitioners can consult: Aspen Institute Education & Society Program, Rising Generations Strategy Group, Hope Chicago, Bellwether's responsible AI framework, Digital Promise, ISTE, and the Edelman Trust Barometer. These are entry points for districts and state policymakers developing rules on AI and classroom technology.

# Bottom line

Dr. Janice Jackson urges a balanced approach: remove the classroom distractions phones create, but hold educational technology and AI to standards of evidence and equity. Put young people at the center of policy design, teach digital literacy, and use state-level policy and sector frameworks to create accountable, trustable guardrails.

More context around this story.

Loading more related stories...

Keep reading in the app

Open the app view to save this story, compare related coverage, and continue from the same source.

Open in app