Thehindu iconThehinduSep 29, 2026 ~4 min source read

NHRC asks Meta, MeitY and Etah officials to respond over alleged exploitation of minors in social videos

A complaint says children were repeatedly used in abusive, politically charged videos; the NHRC sought action reports, directed police to protect and identify the children, and asked Meta and MeitY to explain platform steps and evidence preservation.

NHRC notice to Meta, MeitY, Etah district administration over alleged exploitation of minors

Share this story

Send the public story page.

Useful takeaways from this story.

NHRC issued notice to Meta, the Ministry of Electronics and IT (MeitY) and Etah district authorities after a complaint that minors were repeatedly made to appear in objectionable, politically charged social media videos.

The NHRC directed the Etah Senior Superintendent of Police to identify the children, provide protection and counselling, investigate those who scripted, recorded or uploaded the material, and register an FIR if a cognisable offence emerges.

Meta must explain how the content was repeatedly uploaded and circulated, whether it produced monetisation or commercial benefit, and what steps were taken to preserve relevant digital evidence.

# What happened

# What the NHRC asked for The NHRC bench, led by member Priyank Kanoongo, gave specific directions and time-bound requests:

  • Directed the Senior Superintendent of Police (SSP), Etah, to identify the children involved, ensure their protection and counselling, and investigate persons alleged to have scripted, recorded, uploaded and circulated the videos.
  • Asked the police to register an FIR if a cognisable offence is disclosed and to preserve relevant digital evidence.
  • Directed the District Magistrate to arrange care, protection and rehabilitation measures through the Child Welfare Committee (CWC) and the District Child Protection Unit (DCPU).

# MeitY must explain Meta (parent of Facebook and Instagram) was asked to provide details on:

  • How the same content was repeatedly uploaded and circulated.
  • Whether the content produced any monetisation or commercial benefit.
  • Steps taken to preserve digital evidence and to address/remove the material.

MeitY was asked to examine the platform's due-diligence processes, child safety measures and grievance redressal mechanisms that relate to the complaint.

# Central concerns raised by the complaint Foundation's complaint highlighted four concrete harms:

  • Erosion of children's dignity and privacy because of forced appearances in objectionable material.
  • Potential psychological harm to the children due to repeated involvement and public circulation.
  • Lack of informed parental consent for the children's participation.
  • Possible exploitation by adults who controlled or facilitated the content and its distribution.

# Immediate procedural steps ordered Police and district officials were asked to act on both protection and investigation:

  • Investigate the chain of production and circulation: those who scripted, filmed, uploaded and shared the videos.
  • Preserve digital evidence on platforms and devices to support any criminal or civil action.
  • Use statutory child protection bodies (CWC and DCPU) for care, rehabilitation and follow-up.

# Context and related actions This NHRC notice follows public and regulatory scrutiny around child safety on platforms. The NHRC's procedural demands mirror earlier actions by child protection authorities that have summoned platform officials and sought explanations for child sexual exploitative content and platform ad practices.

# What to watch next

More context around this story.

Keep reading in the app

Open the app view to save this story, compare related coverage, and continue from the same source.

Open in app