Reader comment: Applauding frankness on China’s cost edge in alt‑protein push
A short reader response to William Mitchell’s essay arguing China leads the shift to alternative proteins, noting that cost advantages include lower labour protections.
A short reader response to William Mitchell’s essay arguing China leads the shift to alternative proteins, noting that cost advantages include lower labour protections.
William Mitchell’s piece argues China is advancing alt‑protein production by using fermentation and state support to convert biomass into food protein.
Mitchell cites major environmental reasons to reduce livestock dependence, referencing FAO (2006) and Poore & Nemecek (2018) on land use, emissions, and inefficiency.
The comment is brief and affirms the article’s broader claim that neoliberal policies elsewhere limit public R&D and state backing, widening the gap with China.
On July 2, 2026, a member of the Executive Board, Frank Elderson gave a speech to the 7th World Congress of Environmental and Resource Economists – The green transition – benefits and barriers. In that speech, he directly tied the mounting climate chaos with inflation volatility and emphasised the need to transition as quickly as possible to a net zero carbon economy. The evidence demonstrates that the Chinese are now using its traditional expertise in fermentation to fast track production of Alt protein.
It will also ultimately provide solutions to food insecurity but also for housing construction, given that we cannot keep extracting timber and cement resources at the current rate for much longer. A bushfire in Australia a few years ago created a critical shortage of construction timber and with climate change ongoing those sorts of problems are going to become more acute. Novel food production A recent report put out by Good Food Institute APAC – China's Biomanufacturing Boom Opportunities and Risks for Microbial Protein Producers – is worth considering.
We are now seeing this in the production of EVs, for example. ", the total area dedicated to feedcrop production amounts to 33 percent of total arable land. In all, livestock production accounts for 70 percent of all agricultural land and 30 percent of the land surface of the planet." 3.
@Alan Dunn Not him, but why would Aus stop exporting? It exports to get stuff it wants, and to increase capitalist profits (latter especially true for NET exports). And he did say that Net Exports are closer to aid than trade, cutting aid has consequences for others. "It is a country that engages in an indirect form of
As The Guardian reported in the last day or so: Job losses in EU manufacturing will rapidly increase unless Brussels stops the “colonisation” of industry Read the full article...
It is well worth reading Chantal Mouffe's arguments on the coalescence of a neoliberal consensus in the centre reducing the influence of the left, by leaving a populist shaped hole in the political spectrum. Her version of 'agonism' requires confrontation of different ideologies, not accommodation between professional
@ Bill, I agree with the main thrust of your article, ie that neoliberalism has led to the rise of neofascism, but I wouldn't say the working class in the UK would articulate it in exactly the terms you've used as below. It's been slightly different in Germany. It's mainly the working class in the former DDR who have b
Zid: Some people will say that if people enjoy economic rents, that's their good luck. If that's what some people believe is an acceptable and justifiable outcome of loosely regulated markets, they are entitled to that opinion. But they can't then say that organising a nation around unfettered markets is the best way f

Loading more related stories...
Open the app view to save this story, compare related coverage, and continue from the same source.