Toronto City Council approved a 70‑storey purpose‑built rental building for 164–168 Isabella Street. The approved scheme provides 599 rental units, of which 242 are two‑ and three‑bedroom apartments. The design also includes roughly 27,000 square feet of amenity space, 369 bicycle parking spaces, and the conservation and relocation of two heritage buildings. The development must also deliver 50 rental replacement units for existing tenants.
The location is highly transit‑connected: Sherbourne Station is about a five‑minute walk away, and Wellesley and Bloor‑Yonge stations are nearby. Cogan frames the site as suitable for higher density because residents can access employment, schools, universities, parks, and services without depending on a car. That connectivity directly shaped decisions on parking, cycling infrastructure, and unit mix.
The project includes a substantial share of larger units: 181 two‑bedroom and 61 three‑bedroom units. Cogan explains that offering two‑ and three‑bedroom apartments responds to Toronto's need for rental options that suit families and households wanting long‑term rental tenure. The goal is to broaden rental housing beyond the small‑unit models that dominate many recent builds.
Transportation and parking strategy
The design minimizes vehicle parking and emphasizes transit, walking, and cycling. There are 369 bicycle parking spaces and a transportation plan that assumes many residents will use nearby subway stations and local services. Cogan notes that underground parking is expensive and that reducing parking levels affects project economics. The transit‑first approach aligns with the downtown location and aims to reduce both cost and the development's transportation footprint.
Heritage retention and site composition
Two designated heritage buildings on the site will be retained and relocated closer to Isabella Street. That requires close coordination between heritage consultants, architects, and constructors and influences the design of the tower's base and how the building meets the street. The project team treats the heritage structures and new tower as a single composition so the historic elements feel integrated rather than tacked on.
The project increases rental supply substantially at a central, transit‑oriented location and provides a higher proportion of family‑sized units than many recent developments. The approach—limited vehicle parking, significant bike parking, and preserved heritage buildings—reflects practical tradeoffs among urban design, cost, and local context. The remaining work will test whether the approvals translate into completed housing given the complexity and financial sensitivities of large rental projects.