What Angela Paxton said and why it matters
Her message told women to set aside personal anger and accept that preserving party control of the Senate seat should come first. The columnist challenges that claim, saying a Senate seat belongs to the public and should be subject to voters' judgment about trust and conduct. The piece states Angela Paxton has said she will not campaign for her former husband.
Context: divorce, impeachment, and public record
Last summer Angela Paxton filed for divorce on what she described as "biblical grounds," alleging adultery. Ken Paxton denies the allegation. The columnist points to Paxton's public record: in 2023 the Texas House impeached him on 20 articles. The Texas Senate later acquitted him on 16 articles and dismissed four that had been held in abeyance. The opinion argues that acquittal ends the impeachment trial but does not erase the House record, the testimony, or the public's responsibility to assess it.
The piece highlights outside spending shaping the contest: MAGA Inc., a super PAC aligned with Donald Trump, announced a $10 million ad buy to support Ken Paxton and oppose Democrat James Talarico. The columnist frames that cash as political power protecting political power rather than a grassroots appeal to forgiveness.
Why this matters for women and voters
The author, identifying as a Texas woman and former Republican, links the demand for party loyalty to policy consequences for women in Texas. The state's abortion law is described as among the nation's most restrictive, with no exceptions for rape or incest and narrowly defined exceptions for life-threatening circumstances. The columnist argues women are being asked to absorb the consequences of men in power and to prioritize partisan control over character and accountability.
The opinion urges voters to treat public office as public property, not family property. It contends that when parties expect unconditional loyalty, they weaken the public's leverage to hold officials accountable. The piece asks women and all voters to consider trustworthiness and abuse of public power alongside party policy goals when deciding how to vote.