# What happened
# Why they sued
Access was restored on September 24 after an emergency meeting between government officials and Discord executives. CICC officials later acknowledged that they had underestimated Discord's role as a workplace and education tool.
# Legal claims and arguments
The petitioners say the agencies acted ultra vires — beyond their lawful authority. Their legal arguments include:
- Act (RA 10175) do not grant executive officials the power to block an entire platform nationwide.
- Court previously invalidated warrantless administrative blocking of computer data in Disini v. Secretary of Justice, which the petition cites.
- A blanket platform block is a prior restraint that cuts off millions of lawful users and fails constitutional scrutiny because less restrictive, judicially supervised options exist (targeted URL takedowns, individual account actions, preservation orders).
The petition warns of a recurring pattern where agencies impose sudden blockades and quickly withdraw them before courts can act — a sequence the petitioners describe as leaving digital rights vulnerable despite short-lived restorations.
# Who filed the case
- Atty. Arjel P. de Guzman, technology and IP lawyer and lead counsel
- Christopher Star De La Torre, co-convenor of BetterGov.PH
- Eddie Francis Cesar Plaza, startup founder, Y Combinator alumnus, and law student
- Eliezer "Eli" Rabadon, technologist, businessman, and columnist
- Carlo Ople, entrepreneur, content creator, and founder of Creators Against Corruption
# What petitioners want the Court to do
The petition requests the Supreme Court to:
- Strike down the recent platform blocking orders as illegal
# Stakes and immediate consequences
Petitioners argue that blanket administrative shutdowns disrupt work, education, and livelihoods for millions of Filipinos. They frame the case as seeking a clear, binding rule that executive agencies must use targeted, court-supervised tools when addressing alleged online crimes or harms.
# Where this stands now
The petition was filed directly with the Supreme Court on October 1, 2026. The government lifted the Discord blockade on September 24 after talks with Discord. The case asks the Court for a preventive rule to stop similar actions in the future.