Programme aims to give primary schoolchildren access to hot meals, but parents' experiences show the scheme has not eliminated the need for packed lunches. A large national survey of parents, teachers and suppliers—more than 8,000 respondents—found 80% of parents still send an additional lunch with their child.
What parents report on uptake and scope
Not every primary school has signed up for the programme. Schools that haven't joined cite issues such as logistics, waste and low demand for the current menu. Among schools that do participate, parents report patchy delivery and varied quality.
The national review captured several consistent complaints:
- 64% said the food wasn't nutritious.
- 75% reported their children do not enjoy the variety offered.
- Many parents said reheated food's look and texture put children off.
These problems drive high levels of waste. Parents say more than half of the food provided is often left uneaten. Leftover meals, brought home cold and congealed in school bags, further discourage acceptance.
Parents also point out the scheme typically doesn't include snacks for a 'little break' during the day. That prompted teachers and food educators to call for continued lunchbox ideas. Some families supplement the hot meal because portions are too small, or because children dislike the offered dishes, or because their school simply does not provide the hot meals.
Time to eat: the often-overlooked problem
Across the feedback, the most consistent single issue is time. Children frequently tell parents they "didn't have time to eat it." In a straw poll cited by the columnist, 76% of respondents said their children do not get enough time to eat at school. Short lunch breaks predate the hot meals rollout, and the programme has not changed the underlying structure of the school day.
A review by Fine Gael made only a brief comment noting that school lunches "may be too short to properly consume a hot meal." That indicates awareness without a concrete commitment to redesign the school day around mealtimes. Practical barriers—kitchens, reheating, portion size, and pickup of returned food—remain unaddressed in many schools.
Reformers and parents point to three practical areas for action:
- Reassess the school day timetable to ensure children have enough seated time to eat.
- Adjust portioning and menu variety to match ages and preferences, and add cold options.
- Address reheating, packaging and waste management so food arrives and stays appetising.
Programme has expanded access to hot food for some children, but on-the-ground feedback shows major operational and design problems remain. Until schools give children adequate time to eat and the programme fixes portioning, variety and reheating issues, many parents will keep packing extra food and waste will continue to undermine the scheme's goals.