Caracaschronicles iconCaracaschroniclesSep 9, 2026 ~7 min source read

Is the Oil Deal Trumping Venezuela’s Hopes for Change?

One year after a dramatic kinetic event raised hopes that U.S. pressure would topple chavismo, Venezuelans find their expectations shaken by U.S. engagements with the post-Maduro regime and a contested oil agreement.

Is the Oil Deal Trumping Venezuela’s Hopes for Change?

Share this story

Send the public story page.

Useful takeaways from this story.

The January kinetic episode briefly made direct U.S. intervention seem possible, but the dictator’s removal did not dismantle the state structures many Venezuelans hoped would fall.

The U.S.-Venezuela oil deal has deepened controversy: some see economic openings, others view the pact as entrenching a regime the U.S. once opposed.

Background: a cycle of hope and disappointment

Venezuela's recent political history is being read through a repeating pattern: moments of widespread hope followed by downturns of frustration. That cycle framed reactions to a clear signal one year ago—a "kinetic attack" that made foreign intervention seem plausible. For a time the impossible stopped being unthinkable.

Who watches Trump, and why it matters

Expectations about what the Trump administration will do have become a specific indicator Venezuelans use to gauge their chances for change. Attitudes are diverse. Some Venezuelans still admire Donald Trump—these "MAGAzuelans" include people inside and outside the U.S., not necessarily U.S. voters. Others dislike Trump but believe his administration is the only lever capable of removing chavismo. A smaller group rejects foreign intervention entirely. Many people simply want the regime gone by any means.

January's red dawn: partial gains, persistent problems

Trust deteriorated further after the June 24 footage showing senior U.S. officers meeting civilian and military heads tied to the Rodríguez administration. Comments suggesting confidence in that government's competence and transparency became especially hard to accept among Venezuelans who had expected the U.S. to isolate the regime. Reporting that U.S. officials pressured Panama and Curaçao to block Machado's attempts to reenter Venezuela intensified public anger and online calls for immediate elections.

The oil deal and the debate over outcomes

Public reaction reflects competing priorities. Some people prioritize economic stabilization and are willing to tolerate imperfect politics if services and markets improve. Others prioritize a definitive democratic transition and see the U.S. engagements and oil deal as betraying earlier promises to push for elections. The result is a deepening skepticism toward U.S. intentions and a fracturing of the broad hope that emerged after January.

A year after a dramatic episode raised expectations, Venezuelans face a reality in which partial gains coexist with continuing deprivation and political exclusion. The U.S. oil agreement and diplomatic moves have complicated the picture, leaving many Venezuelans doubting that foreign engagement will deliver the democratic change they sought.

More context around this story.

Loading more related stories...

Keep reading in the app

Open the app view to save this story, compare related coverage, and continue from the same source.

Open in app